電源戦争ウルフ Posted June 7, 2011 Report Share Posted June 7, 2011 [img]http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/710/267700.jpg[/img] Red-Eyes B. Dragon + Dark Magician This card can only be summoned by the above fusion monsters and Polymerization. When this card is summoned, place 3 spell counters on this card (max.3). This card gains 1000 ATK for every spell counter on it. You can remove a spell counter from this card to destroy a card on the field. If this card has no spell counters on it, you can destroy this card and summon one "Red-Eyes B. Dragon" and one "Dark Magician" from your graveyard. [img]http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/121/267700b.jpg[/img] Red-Eyes B. Dragon + Red-Eyes B. Dragon + Red-Eyes B. Dragon Once per turn, during your main phase, you can destroy one card you control. If so, you can inflict 1000 damage to your opponent. This card gains 100 ATK for every Dragon-Type monster in your graveyard. This card gains 200 ATK for every "Red-Eyes" monster in your graveyard. When this card is destroyed, destroy every card on your opponent's side of the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted June 7, 2011 Report Share Posted June 7, 2011 Neither of these are really Red-Eyes support. The first isn't very good because you don't ever see Dark Magician in a Red-Eyes deck, and it being Spellcaster only makes it harder to get our. Ultimate is just a carbon copy of Blue-Eyes, gives them a good beatstick, but I'd rather it have 3000 ATK and a useable effect than just being a massive monster. And also, if you want your cards to recieve all the Red-Eyes support, they need the hyphen between "Red" and "Eyes". That's pretty much the way it is :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatMachine Posted June 7, 2011 Report Share Posted June 7, 2011 Yeah, these aren't really support cards. the first one seems like some b-s friendship thing from the anime, and it isn't really practical. the second one is okay, but i don't understand the significance except for being a counterpart to Blue-Eyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted June 7, 2011 Report Share Posted June 7, 2011 2nd card is overdone 1st card is OPed regardless of the decreasing effects, and its effect is very unoriginal 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 I focus on 1st card, It is OPed and considered broken IMO. why? because you can use Swamp King or another substituter to call this monster. better change the requirement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 actually the 2nd card if you make the effect unique enough it would be fine as long as it's not going to rival something like Blue Eyes Shining Dragon, meant to support Blues Eyes Ultimate Dragon, which turned out to be a total disaster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen-Psi Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 Card blows, is too op'ed, and on top of that the effect is not even slightly original. 4/10 sorry dude can't give you credit for trying with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
電源戦争ウルフ Posted June 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 Edited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synchronized Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 If you don't mind me asking, where did you get the picture for the first one? It's really cool and I would totally use that for a card idea I had in mind. That being said, neither one is [i]bad[/i] per se, but I think Red-Eyes Ultimate Dragon's field destruction effect is over the top. Maybe limit it to destroy up to 3 cards on the field, or something along those lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 [quote name='Star' timestamp='1307542495' post='5266711'] That being said, neither one is [i]bad[/i] per se, but I think Red-Eyes Ultimate Dragon's field destruction effect is over the top. Maybe limit it to destroy up to 3 cards on the field, or something along those lines. [/quote] Sorry to point this out, but Absolute Zero's effect kills the opponent's front row and is a lot easier to get out. That effect is fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
電源戦争ウルフ Posted June 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 [quote name='Star' timestamp='1307542495' post='5266711'] If you don't mind me asking, where did you get the picture for the first one? It's really cool and I would totally use that for a card idea I had in mind. That being said, neither one is [i]bad[/i] per se, but I think Red-Eyes Ultimate Dragon's field destruction effect is over the top. Maybe limit it to destroy up to 3 cards on the field, or something along those lines. [/quote] Here's the pic: [img]http://th02.deviantart.com/fs22/300W/i/2007/331/2/8/Red_Eyes_B__Magician_by_teramaster.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 [quote name='HiroMax' timestamp='1307539234' post='5266636'] Edited. [/quote] just so you know these are still relatively overdone ideas...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
電源戦争ウルフ Posted June 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 BUMP! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.