Hikaru Uchiha Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 Here are a few cards that I have made for my new set "An Amphibious Assault". This set has "Amphibian" monsters, which is a special type like Gemini or Union monsters. I can't decide what their regular types should be though. I'm thinking Aqua for the Water-Attribute ones, but I don't know about the Earth-Attributes. Please rate each one and if you want, give me some ideas/names/effects for additional cards. Thanks in advance for you help! [img]http://img607.imageshack.us/img607/7884/371988.jpg[/img] [img]http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/7884/371988.jpg[/img] [img]http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/9937/371988s.jpg[/img] [img]http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/7884/371988.jpg[/img] [img]http://img546.imageshack.us/img546/4626/371988r.jpg[/img] (Needs an additional effect) [img]http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/7884/371988.jpg[/img] (Needs an additional effect) Crappy picture, I know... I will add more cards as I make them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcher boyz Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Frog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Time Psyduck Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 As was mentioned, there's already a frog set. Aqua-type would be fine for all of them - the newest Japanese set mixed up some of the type/attribute relationships anyway, so EARTH/Aqua isn't a problem. It also means you could drop the sub-type and just let the field spell work on Aqua-types (or even EARTH Aqua-types.) Why do they have the double attributes? If it's just to reference that they're aquatic, then it's not worth it. It just complicates matters for no real benefit. Unless some other cards include effects that need a monster to have both attributes then there's not much point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alice Moonflowyr Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 you could stick the "Amphibian" in their name and make them all Aqua. 4/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 a little TOO realistic of pics and make them reptile or aqua type, don't choose amphibian type I'm curious why you made the 1st 3 also EARTH monsters...... 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hikaru Uchiha Posted June 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 [quote name='Time Psyduck' timestamp='1307548888' post='5266900'] As was mentioned, there's already a frog set. Aqua-type would be fine for all of them - the newest Japanese set mixed up some of the type/attribute relationships anyway, so EARTH/Aqua isn't a problem. It also means you could drop the sub-type and just let the field spell work on Aqua-types (or even EARTH Aqua-types.) Why do they have the double attributes? If it's just to reference that they're aquatic, then it's not worth it. It just complicates matters for no real benefit. Unless some other cards include effects that need a monster to have both attributes then there's not much point. [/quote] Thanks for the info about the Type-Attribute thing, but I want to keep the sub-type though. As for the dual attributes, it's because they're amphibians. Amphibian means they can live on land or in water, so I thought they should have both Earth and Water Attributes. And I know about the "Frog" sub-type, but this sub-type covers more than just frogs as you can see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.