Indignation211 Posted June 21, 2011 Report Share Posted June 21, 2011 [img]http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/925/313882.jpg[/img] Lore: This card can only be Special Summoned by its own effect. You can reveal this card in your hand to negate an opponent's monster's attack and destroy that monster, then Special Summon this card. When this card is attacked by an opponent's monster while in Attack Position, apply the DEF of this card for damage calculation. Well let me know what you guys think. EDIT: Err... yeah the initial version of this card was quite overpowered (dont' quite know what i was thinking... oh yeah Shooting Star Dragon levels of brokeness... in the anime at least). Made four changes to reign it in some. 1) Removed "cannot be destroyed by card effects." 2) Restricted its Special Summon effect to stopping attacks only. 3) Lowered its ATK by 200 points. 4) Removed the restriction on Normal Summoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bebe3434 Posted June 21, 2011 Report Share Posted June 21, 2011 This card is ridiculously ovp'd. Your basically getting an indestructable 4000 ATK monster for stopping an opponents attack/ card effect...... hardly fair. You need to add some drawbacks and reduce its ATK and DEF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted June 21, 2011 Report Share Posted June 21, 2011 Here's a unique-er effect in quite a while. I've never seen such a way of summoning. It is slightly broken... but well... 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indignation211 Posted June 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2011 Yeah don't know why I thought a monster that takes either 4000 ATK or Banish/Bounce to get rid of that can be special summoned by negating an attack or spell/trap card was balanced. New version is vulnerable to effect destruction and can no longer stop Spells or Traps, also its ATK has been lowered slightly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.