Synchronized Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 [center][i]Some "Crystal Beast" support as a continuation of this "set" I'm working on. This might be used in my Fan-Fic, YuGiOh! Hidden Legacy, (pardon the cheap plug) so be on the lookout for that if you find the card interesting.[/i] [img]http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/7148/3059.jpg[/img] [quote]Banish 1 "Crystal Beast" monster you control: Select up to 2 "Crystal Beast" monsters from your Deck and place them in your Spell & Trap Card Zone, face-up, as Continuous Spell Cards. In addition, if the monster Banished is "Crystal Beast Ruby Carbuncle": You can Special Summon 1 Level 3 "Crystal Beast" monster from your hand.[/quote][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel of Silence Posted July 2, 2011 Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 I always did like Crystal beasts. OCG is fine. The effect is good, and seems balanced. The pic looks great. Overall it seems great. 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zodiark1209 Posted July 2, 2011 Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 not to be judgmental or anything, but it kind of looks like something you would find on Pokemon. but, you should also make a fusion of the crystal beasts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmon Posted July 2, 2011 Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 Good 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted July 2, 2011 Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 [quote name='zodiark1209' timestamp='1309566918' post='5326536'] not to be judgmental or anything, but it kind of looks like something you would find on Pokemon. but, you should also make a fusion of the crystal beasts [/quote] Well, Ruby looks a lot like it [I]was[/I] a Pokemon once, so it's unavoidable. It would be cool if you added more Crystal cards, like Evolved versions of the current beasts. They were a pretty good archetype. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.