Mors Secundis Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 [quote name='Mikhail Nekem'evič Tal' timestamp='1310221362' post='5340322'] Brainwashed, psychotic, media sheep like yourself make me sick.. [/quote] No. Brainwashed, What the f***? Psychotic, Not anymore, thanks though for bringing up my past. Media Sheep? don't know what this even means? I'm more against the media, than the rest of the world was against the holocaust, which is to say a lot. But the way people are speaking she is 100% guilty of her crime, I'm going of what i've read on the Wiki and what people have been saying, I study law in my spare time and even so I think shes guilty, she killed a kid, why is she any better than , ted bundy, The Zodiac killer or The Yorkshire ripper. shes a killer, End of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 [quote name='.:Åπimα FΩrmµlα:.' timestamp='1310218002' post='5340242'] Innocent Until Proven Otherwise. Gotta love broken Law systems haven't we? [/quote] The victim was killed by a steak knife that was the exact same brand as you have in your kitchen. You get the electric chair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tentacruel Posted July 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 If it was really that obvious that she did, the jury would have voted guilty, and believe me, they wanted to vote guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grunt Issun Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 [quote name='.:Åπimα FΩrmµlα:.' timestamp='1310225136' post='5340425'] No. Brainwashed, What the f***? Psychotic, Not anymore, thanks though for bringing up my past. Media Sheep? don't know what this even means? I'm more against the media, than the rest of the world was against the holocaust, which is to say a lot. But the way [b]people are speaking [/b]she is 100% guilty of her crime, I'm going of what i've read on the Wiki and [b]what people have been saying[/b], I study law in my spare time and even so I think shes guilty, she killed a kid, why is she any better than , ted bundy, The Zodiac killer or The Yorkshire ripper. shes a killer, End of. [/quote] A.K.A. the media @Miror, dude... theres more then one set of Steak knives per brand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 [quote name='~N~' timestamp='1310226755' post='5340482'] A.K.A. the media @Miror, dude... theres more then one set of Steak knives per brand. [/quote] I'm saying that I'd rather have "Innocent until proven otherwise" than "Guilty until proven otherwise" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grunt Issun Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 Oh, I read your post wrong, sorry, I didn't understand what you were getting at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JadenxAtemYAOI Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 You have a child left at home, no guardian/babysitter/father, you have the only person that's raised her from day one at the house everyday that has taken care of the child since day 1, you can tell by her eyes she's on some sort of drug or medication, you have a house full of possible weapons, then you have Calee. Unless there was a pedophile living on their street which was very unlikely then yes her mother wouldn't have. The problem remains her mother HAS a motivation and that is the stress of being parent. All of you can ask your parents right now how stressful it was to raise you, take care of you, in those earlier years. Shaken baby syndrome exists for a reason people. Parents can and have shaken their babies to death out stress and Calee is still young enough to be affected by it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 [quote name='Passions of the Flame' timestamp='1310239238' post='5340867'] You have a child left at home, no guardian/babysitter/father, you have the only person that's raised her from day one at the house everyday that has taken care of the child since day 1, you can tell by her eyes she's on some sort of drug or medication, you have a house full of possible weapons, then you have Calee. Unless there was a pedophile living on their street which was very unlikely then yes her mother wouldn't have. The problem remains her mother HAS a motivation and that is the stress of being parent. All of you can ask your parents right now how stressful it was to raise you, take care of you, in those earlier years. Shaken baby syndrome exists for a reason people. Parents can and have shaken their babies to death out stress and Calee is still young enough to be affected by it. [/quote] Thank you Captain Obvious for Anthony's motive. Now, here is the motive for Caylee's murder. A stressed out single parent under the influence who accidentally killed their child in a fit of stress? SEND HER TO OLD SPARKY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JadenxAtemYAOI Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 They have before. There was a father on drugs that took his whole family out to a frozen lake and killed them all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt. Colonel Remo Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 daed child? bury child buried daed child? party tiem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JadenxAtemYAOI Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 Correction, he was an alcoholic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catman25 Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 It's just sad she'll be making a crap load of money with book deals and stuff if she so chooses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flinsbon Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 [quote name='Dark' timestamp='1310184797' post='5339617'] From my understanding, the jury had the option of giving her life in prison as an alternative to the death penalty. I don't know a great deal about the judicial system, so maybe I falsely heard that from somewhere. :/ [/quote] Well I didn't follow the case 24/7 but from what I heard it was likely she woulda been killed if she was found guilty. Idk if that was just the media, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tentacruel Posted July 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 My theory is this. The b**** didn't just kill Caylee outright at all. Poor little Caylee died because of the mother's negligence. She either accidentally killed Caylee in a fit of stress like someone said one page back, or Caylee died because Casey wasn't looking after her properly. Casey then proceeded to freak out and hide the body. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vough Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 [quote name='ADHD-Guitar' timestamp='1310241810' post='5340971'] My theory is this. The b**** didn't just kill Caylee outright at all. Poor little Caylee died because of the mother's negligence. She either accidentally killed Caylee in a fit of stress like someone said one page back, or Caylee died because Casey wasn't looking after her properly. Casey then proceeded to freak out and hide the body. [/quote] freak out? "My daughter's dead! WTF?? What do I do with her? Throw her in the trunk! WOOT I'VE BEEN PARTYING NON-STOP FOR THE LAST MONTH! Wait...what's that awful smell in the back of my car? Oh God...it's my dead daughter...what should I do??? I KNOW! I'll throw the rotting corpse in a swamp! PROBLEM SOLVED!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 I don't think you are fully understanding what ADHD is trying to say. And yes, again, I have to agree with him. The baby could have died in an accident, and Casey subsequently may have had a panic attack. She tried to hide the baby because she knew that if anyone found out, they would assume that she did it. The partying was to get her mind off of her dead daughter. There was no point turning it into a police because she knew it was an accident and because it could only result in negative consequences. When she finally had to get rid of the baby, she made it look like a murder and threw Caylee into a swamp. Finally her lies caught up to her and people thought she killed her daughter, anyways. And that's just a hypothetical scenario. Who is to say that her murdering her daughter is any more valid than the story I just proposed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 [quote name='Passions of the Flame' timestamp='1310239887' post='5340897'] They have before. There was a father on drugs that took his whole family out to a frozen lake and killed them all. [/quote] ROID RAGE IT'S GOOFY TIME Let's face it, if your baby dies and you are a single mother with a family history of drug abuse and obviously heavy stress, of course you will be suspected of doing it. A person on prescription drugs who is already stressed out will just hide the body and be in denial. She'll try and take her mind off of the incident by doing whatever she can to distract herself. The media are the scum that have turned her into some kind of 21st century Ted Bundy figure. She isn't. Bundy was a dangerously intelligent psychopathic necrophiliac that got off to violence, she is just a sad single mother who is at the centre of a media storm. I really pity her, even if she did do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 [quote name='Jinzo' timestamp='1310089383' post='5336915'] This [s]b****[/s] fine excuse for an human being, had Oj's lawyer AND jury. [/quote] that explains a lot. she's obviously guilty. those people are ideots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vough Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 [quote name='Jord200' timestamp='1310263186' post='5341799'] that explains a lot. she's obviously guilty. those people are ideots. [/quote] Wait, literally? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 People in this topic are starting to remind me of the old witch trials, where you had to drown in order to prove your innocense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tentacruel Posted July 10, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 Wow, you'd think people would realize how stupid that sounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grunt Issun Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 Witch trials: They accuse you of being a witch and throw you into water, if you drown your innocent... but you're dead, if you float, your a witch and they kill you What people think of this trial: She was accused of killing her child, so they put her on trial, they don't figure out she's guilty, LET KILL HER ANYWAY! Same thing pretty much, actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elƒie Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 Either she's guilty or not, she should have been guilty for neglect cause she waited what? 30 DAYS TO REPORT HER CHILD MISSING!? Any kind of good mother would report her child missing the moment they knew for sure! Heck, even when they suspect their child is missing, mothers go nuts and call around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T. Sankara Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 [quote name='Dark' timestamp='1310089831' post='5336931'] Good job, TC. I was going to make a thread about this, but I had the decency to check the first page of General (the only place this topic can exist) before senselessly going with my idea. I wish all people were like me. It should also be noted that I was shocked to see this thread only had six replies. I thought General section likes controversial topics. Judge gave the harshest term he could based on what she actually was guilty for; I feel the decision was fair and justified. Nothing in the prosecution's argument [i]proved[/i] that she killed her daughter. It was a bunch of circumstantial evidence which stated nothing. She lied to the police. All that proves is that she lied to the police. She searched for chloroform, yet the cause of death (I don't actually think there was one) stated nothing about asphyxiation. I'm not saying she's [i]innocent[/i], I could care either way whether she actually killed her daughter or not. I'm just glad that the American justice system (or, most of it) realizes that you can't throw someone in jail for something you [i]think[/i] they did. Nothing was proven, her term (like, one week) was perfectly fair, and society needs to learn how the justice system works before they baww about her. I believe I was watching CNN and some analyst said that Casey was actually in danger if she continued to live in Florida. I'm surprised that the government, especially in this situation where society is retarded enough to be against her, doesn't provide her with some sort of security. I mean, she's going to be shunned from society for the rest of her life, and that's perfectly fine. But let's not have someone murder her because they think she murdered someone. [i]acquittal was due to a flaw in the legal system.[/i] wut Every legal system is flawed because every legal system is based on people and people are flawed. A statistic was shown that 85 to 90 percent of all cases result in some form of conviction, so I don't understand why people are going crazy over one not guilty verdict. Not everyone is guilty because they are accused, and I think this case, more than anything, shows how "innocent until proven otherwise" really shines. Also, it's cool to note that, despite the majority of society without regard to political affiliation believing she should have been convicted with first-degree murder or manslaughter, the majority of the people that believe the jury's verdict was justified are Democrats. Just food for thought. [/quote] This. 100% this. Frankly I'm sick of hearing my mother b**** and moan about how "THIS TRICK SHOULD BE IN JAIL". No I don't think she's innocent, but there, as said above, was no SOLID evidence. Period. Still can't believe she might get a movie and become a porn star too. >_> Then again, she is hot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 [quote name='Aisu Valkov' timestamp='1310338196' post='5343886'] Either she's guilty or not, she should have been guilty for neglect cause she waited what? 30 DAYS TO REPORT HER CHILD MISSING!? Any kind of good mother would report her child missing the moment they knew for sure! Heck, even when they suspect their child is missing, mothers go nuts and call around. [/quote] Again, chances are she already knew Caylee was dead. In fact, that is most definitely the case. The fact of the matter is that we just don't know what exactly happened; how the baby died, who killed the baby, et cetera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.