Tymur Shayk Posted August 4, 2011 Report Share Posted August 4, 2011 Image credit goes to "hpdoom" All criticism, bad and good is welcome. [center][center][img]http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/4140/459095.jpg[/img][/center][/center] [center][center]Lore: This card is also treated as a Dragon-Type monster and can be used as a substitute listed on a Fusion Material Dragon-Type monster. Increase the ATK of this card by 200 for each Dragon-Type monster in your Graveyard and Decrease its ATK by 100 for each Warrior on the field. As long as this card remains face-up on the field, your opponent cannot select Dragon-Type monsters as an Attack Target, except this card.[/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therrion Posted August 4, 2011 Report Share Posted August 4, 2011 [center][center]Nice balance on it being a Level 5 1800 then getting powered, also the Goldrare Armor effect.[/center][/center] [center][center]It is no more OP then the Lightsworn Dragon (Which is OP), So I think this card is balanced.[/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center]8.7/10[/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tymur Shayk Posted August 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 5, 2011 Thank you for the review. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glogatha Posted August 5, 2011 Report Share Posted August 5, 2011 its alright, it can get pretty strong in the right deck, and negates attacks on oyher dragons, I could see this in a dragon based deck 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 5, 2011 Report Share Posted August 5, 2011 I don't exactly see why drop its atk for every warrior on the field Personally I think you can go for more After all, Buster Blader can do 500 for every Dragon type on the opponent's side of the field and graveyard, and 2600 atk is reasonable for lv7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.