DarkFirez Posted September 13, 2011 Report Share Posted September 13, 2011 What do you think ? [img]http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/6916/465417t.jpg[/img] 1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner Spellcaster-Type monsters. This card uneffects of a Spell Card, Trap Card or Effect’s Monster. When this card is Summoned successfully, add 1 Field Spell Card from your Deck to your hand. Once per turn, you can activate 1 of the following effects: Remove 1 Spell Counter on the field to Special Summon a Spellcaster-type monster from your hand, Deck, Graveyard. Destroy 1 Trap-Spell or Monters Card your opponent controls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrus Posted September 13, 2011 Report Share Posted September 13, 2011 Horrible OCG. Strange thing is, some of it you've got down perfectly and some of it isn't even grammatically correct. Also, this thing is ridiculously easy to summon. Overpowered for obvious reasons (as I understand it, by removing 1 counter you can SS 3 Spellcasters?.. That can fill your field in a second. ) Also, a 3500 attacker that's immune to spells, traps and effects? AND it can destroy a card once per turn? Really, this is ridiculous. You have a lot to learn. But I can see some kind of originality in this card so I won't give it a complete zero/10 so, 3/10 2/10 for being (sort of) original (I like the idea of removing spc to ss spellcasters, although in this case it's waaaaaaaaaay tooo much overkil) + 1/10 for being a noob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted September 14, 2011 Report Share Posted September 14, 2011 "Remove 1 Spell Counter on the field to Special Summon a Spellcaster-type monster from your hand, Deck, Graveyard. Destroy 1 Trap-Spell or Monters Card your opponent control" This is way too OPed you need to specify the spellcaster that'll get summoned this way. One spell counter removal is too cheap a cost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.