.Rai Posted September 13, 2011 Report Share Posted September 13, 2011 I'll write an explanation and guide to the card later. OCG is as accurate as it is for now, simply because of new terms. Half-new terms, as it's similar to other cards, but yeah. So no "Just an OCG fix" please. [center][IMG]http://i53.tinypic.com/23sc6ko.jpg[/IMG][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AkatsukiPride! Posted September 13, 2011 Report Share Posted September 13, 2011 Interesting idea, a monster and a field. Well, technically, thats what it is. Its a good, usable card. A lot of decks have field spells, so this is a very useful card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted September 13, 2011 Report Share Posted September 13, 2011 "Must first be Special Summoned by..." That's what your first line should say. Does exactly what you want it to, prevents being Special Summoned by Instant Fusion-eske cards. You should apply the effect to change this card's name and effect, otherwise it doesn't work with some of the field support. An example is how you can't use "Royal Tribute" even if Gravekeeper's priestess is on the field, because there isn't actually a face-up Necrovalley on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted September 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2011 [quote name='Miror B.' timestamp='1315957884' post='5513093'] "Must first be Special Summoned by..." That's what your first line should say. Does exactly what you want it to, prevents being Special Summoned by Instant Fusion-eske cards. You should apply the effect to change this card's name and effect, otherwise it doesn't work with some of the field support. An example is how you can't use "Royal Tribute" even if Gravekeeper's priestess is on the field, because there isn't actually a face-up Necrovalley on the field. [/quote] I doubt there are that many Instant Fusion-esque cards. But I'll fix anyway. The effect was built like that intentionally. I don't really want an even more abusable toolbox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted September 14, 2011 Report Share Posted September 14, 2011 [quote name='Cursed Reaction' timestamp='1315958593' post='5513138'] I doubt there are that many Instant Fusion-esque cards. But I'll fix anyway. [/quote] The way you wrote it stops instant fusion anyway, so I just gave you the shorter version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted September 14, 2011 Report Share Posted September 14, 2011 nothing really too new, just effect siphoning effect but at least you gave it some protection for it, and therefore it would be fine, I'll give this fusion 8.7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.