DestinyGame Posted September 22, 2011 Report Share Posted September 22, 2011 Chaos Arsenal Dragon [img]http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/2036/487823.jpg[/img] 1 DARK Tuner + 1 or more LIGHT non-Tuner monsters Once per turn, you can have this card lose 500 ATK and DEF: Return 1 monster your opponent controls to his/her Deck and shuffle. If this card's ATK and DEF are 1000 or lower because of this effect: Destroy this card. During your next Main Phase, you can banish 1 LIGHT monster and 1 DARK monster from your Graveyard: Special Summon this card with its effect negated. Plz rate & commend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
groniack Posted September 22, 2011 Report Share Posted September 22, 2011 This card is pretty good I really like it . It is very useful and its effect is balanced. The only thing i would suggest you is not to return your opponent's monster to the top of their Deck. That way your opponent wouldn't draw new cards which is a huge drawback. So i suggest you to return your opponent's monster to their hand and add another effect. Otherwise your idea is very good. I would use it if it was real 9,4/10 Good job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted September 23, 2011 Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 well since it has to apply to both the atk and the def, you'll have to pull the effect off 4 times, and I doubt it'll really last that long anyway you shouldn't have said returning the card to the top of their deck though. I'd have said return it to their deck, then they shuffle their deck 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DestinyGame Posted September 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 [quote name='groniack' timestamp='1316715833' post='5532967'] This card is pretty good I really like it . It is very useful and its effect is balanced. The only thing i would suggest you is not to return your opponent's monster to the top of their Deck. That way your opponent wouldn't draw new cards which is a huge drawback. So i suggest you to return your opponent's monster to their hand and add another effect. Otherwise your idea is very good. I would use it if it was real 9,4/10 Good job [/quote] [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1316740594' post='5533776'] well since it has to apply to both the atk and the def, you'll have to pull the effect off 4 times, and I doubt it'll really last that long anyway you shouldn't have said returning the card to the top of their deck though. I'd have said return it to their deck, then they shuffle their deck 9.5/10 [/quote] Tk for commending. I'll fix it right away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DestinyGame Posted September 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 BUMP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Moon Posted September 23, 2011 Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 [font=arial,helvetica,sans-serif][size=3]Dude, where'd you get the image? It's awesome!! ^^[/size][/font] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DestinyGame Posted September 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 [quote name='ハネクリボー' timestamp='1316788780' post='5534613'] [font=arial,helvetica,sans-serif][size=3]Dude, where'd you get the image? It's awesome!! ^^[/size][/font] [/quote] I got it from Jazin Kay's image archive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTW (For The Wynn) Posted September 23, 2011 Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 Unfortunately I am not familiar with the new OCG so I'm not entirely sure how correct that is, especially the last sentence. It looks close enough though, so that is fine. Image is fine, being from Jazin's archive. This card reminds me a lot of Light and Darkness Dragon, but not quite. I think it is fairly balanced, but I think the revive effect is a little strong. The way it is worded, you could effectively summon this card quite a lot in say a Chaos deck or a Blacksworn deck. It is hard to say. Just a little to abusable I think. 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DestinyGame Posted September 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 [quote name='FTW (For The Wynn)' timestamp='1316790132' post='5534635'] Unfortunately I am not familiar with the new OCG so I'm not entirely sure how correct that is, especially the last sentence. It looks close enough though, so that is fine. Image is fine, being from Jazin's archive. This card reminds me a lot of Light and Darkness Dragon, but not quite. I think it is fairly balanced, but I think the revive effect is a little strong. The way it is worded, you could effectively summon this card quite a lot in say a Chaos deck or a Blacksworn deck. It is hard to say. Just a little to abusable I think. 8.5/10 [/quote] Naw, I got this ideal from Dark End Dragon, but I fixed a little bit to make it different and unique. By the way, thanks for commending. I'm a new member, so I not sure if my TGC is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varionius Posted September 23, 2011 Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 Not bad, but in "During your next Main Phase, you can banish 1 LIGHT monster and 1 DARK monster from your Graveyard: Special Summon this card with its effect negated." you didn't specify form where, probably from the graveyard, but just guessing. 7.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted September 23, 2011 Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 [quote name='shinkenger4ever' timestamp='1316701901' post='5532684'] 1 DARK Tuner + 1 or more LIGHT non-Tuner monsters Once per turn, you can have this card lose 500 ATK and DEF: Return 1 monster your opponent controls to his/her Deck and shuffle. If this card's ATK and DEF are 1000 or lower because of this effect: Destroy this card. During your next Main Phase, you can banish 1 LIGHT monster and 1 DARK monster from your Graveyard: Special Summon this card with its effect negated. [/quote] Not familiar with the new OCG, but I think the first sentence should read "Once per turn, you can have this card lose 500 ATK and DEF to return 1 monster your opponent controls to his/her Deck." Or "Once per turn, you can decrease the ATK and DEF of this card by 500 to..." Second line sounds off. "If the ATK and DEF of this card becomes 1000 or less because of it's effect, destroy this card." Sounds closer. I'm not sure what you mean in your last effect. The Main Phase after it is destroyed? "During your next Main Phase after this card was destroyed by it's own effect, you can Banish 1 LIGHT and 1 DARK monster in your Graveyard to Special Summon this card from your Graveyard. It's effect(s) are negated." In today's game, it'd be a one time use effect. It would be very difficult for it to somehow live past that first use. It fails in many ways compared to Brionac and Trish, and once it's effect is used, is weaker than them, too. It's destruction effect is meaningless to me, given it wouldn't live that long anyway. It's last effect is...interesting. It's a free 2700 beater. Overall, could be better, but it's actually something I'd consider realistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted September 23, 2011 Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 [quote name='Yankee' timestamp='1316803645' post='5534953'] Not familiar with the new OCG, but I think the first sentence should read "Once per turn, you can have this card lose 500 ATK and DEF to return 1 monster your opponent controls to his/her Deck." Or "Once per turn, you can decrease the ATK and DEF of this card by 500 to..." Second line sounds off. "If the ATK and DEF of this card becomes 1000 or less because of it's effect, destroy this card." Sounds closer. I'm not sure what you mean in your last effect. The Main Phase after it is destroyed? "During your next Main Phase after this card was destroyed by it's own effect, you can Banish 1 LIGHT and 1 DARK monster in your Graveyard to Special Summon this card from your Graveyard. It's effect(s) are negated." In today's game, it'd be a one time use effect. It would be very difficult for it to somehow live past that first use. It fails in many ways compared to Brionac and Trish, and once it's effect is used, is weaker than them, too. It's destruction effect is meaningless to me, given it wouldn't live that long anyway. It's last effect is...interesting. It's a free 2700 beater. Overall, could be better, but it's actually something I'd consider realistic. [/quote] Don't correct something that isn't broken. His OCG is sound, so don't criticize it. It can be pretty broken in Lightsworn because it doesn't need to be destroyed by it's own effect... But that's about it. It's a good card, though. Love the first effect so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted September 23, 2011 Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 @ above: [quote name='Yankee' timestamp='1316803645' post='5534953'] [b]Not familiar with the new OCG,[/b] [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted September 23, 2011 Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 [quote name='Yankee' timestamp='1316804343' post='5534966'] @ above: [/quote] Then why try fixing something you're not familiar with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted September 23, 2011 Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 Yankee's was actually correct, it just served a different purpose. The way on the card starts a chain then nukes, but the way he did it looks more like the way a Malefic would be written, where it just blows up without starting a chain at all. Either way works really. At least for the second line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted September 23, 2011 Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 [quote name='Miror B.' timestamp='1316804926' post='5534988'] Yankee's was actually correct, it just served a different purpose. The way on the card starts a chain then nukes, but the way he did it looks more like the way a Malefic would be written, where it just blows up without starting a chain at all. Either way works really. At least for the second line [/quote] It therefore changed the way the card would be played. :l It's not a good thing when you wildly tamper with the ideas and creativity of others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted September 23, 2011 Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 Whatever Although the last line seems to have misused the colon. Should probably be: [quote name='shinkenger4ever' timestamp='1316701901' post='5532684'] During your next Main Phase[b][u]:[/u][/b] You can banish 1 LIGHT monster and 1 DARK monster from your Graveyard[b][u];[/u][/b] Special Summon this card with its effect negated. [/quote] Costs and conditions and whatnot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DestinyGame Posted September 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2011 [quote name='Yankee' timestamp='1316803645' post='5534953'] Not familiar with the new OCG, but I think the first sentence should read "Once per turn, you can have this card lose 500 ATK and DEF to return 1 monster your opponent controls to his/her Deck." Or "Once per turn, you can decrease the ATK and DEF of this card by 500 to..." Second line sounds off. "If the ATK and DEF of this card becomes 1000 or less because of it's effect, destroy this card." Sounds closer. I'm not sure what you mean in your last effect. The Main Phase after it is destroyed? "During your next Main Phase after this card was destroyed by it's own effect, you can Banish 1 LIGHT and 1 DARK monster in your Graveyard to Special Summon this card from your Graveyard. It's effect(s) are negated." In today's game, it'd be a one time use effect. It would be very difficult for it to somehow live past that first use. It fails in many ways compared to Brionac and Trish, and once it's effect is used, is weaker than them, too. It's destruction effect is meaningless to me, given it wouldn't live that long anyway. It's last effect is...interesting. It's a free 2700 beater. Overall, could be better, but it's actually something I'd consider realistic. [/quote] Actually I made it return the opponent's monster to the top of his/her Deck. Want me to edit it again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.