Careless Whisper Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 wow, everytime I see a new card from you I'm at awe. Great job with the new cards. 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Master Posted February 23, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 thanks ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 All of them are plagued with OCG errors. Their effects aren't that original or great and a lot of the images are WAY overused and a few blurry. And Angel Of Death is underpowered. You have to tribute 3 monsters and then if you're LUCKY and have left overs it can max 3500 but you lost your whole field and card advantage and it can so easily be killed by a rogue saku or Dimensional Prison? Not for me. Good Effort.HAMCHA: DO NOT DOUBLE POST Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 Alright, here's the get-go. Not a bad idea, but not a great one either. The uniqueness and overall feel of the set comes across as a bit repetitive. Also, I don't know about you, but my personal preference is to use established Types. Instead of "Angel" you should just use Fairy-Type. I know some of cards require "Angel" monsters in their effects, but I really don't think those effects are very interesting-so no loss there. The images don't really match, and you have quite a bit of an OCG errors. Try to fix those. Finally, this kind of a set has been done before, so let's hope you can show us something original and new with these so-called "Angels." My rating for the set overall: 6.5/10, or 65/100. You have a long way to go, but pull through, and I'm sure you'll manage. No offense, but I think you really should try to fix this, since I can't fathom why this Thread has 9/10 ratings. Good luck and feel free to PM me like before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Master Posted February 23, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 well im goin to change it to now ... 7 / 10 ... wewt...still some of the highest i got...i figured it out, its actually 8.sumthin / 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RestLess-BoTics Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 The high quality of effort, really varies from card to card, so try and improve on being a consistent cardmaker. Once you learn the element of consistency, you'll gain the necessary experience, in becoming an amazing cardmaker. To conclude my post, I must say, keep up the amazing work. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Master Posted February 23, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 so ill take that positively...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 Here's a tip:Â If someone says that your cards have OCG errors, ask them to what the error ares and ask them to show you how to fix them, then use the knowledge you gain to creat your next set of cards as perfect s you can make them. Â Follow this tip and you will become one of the greatest card makers here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Master Posted February 23, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 thanks man, ill do that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirbeanalot Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 What anomu said lol, 8/10. Don't like Angel of Death. Have to waste too many cards and risk losing the match for a 3500+ attack monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Master Posted February 23, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 angel of death's attack can go up to 5500 or higher lol... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.