BFG Studios Posted December 20, 2011 Report Share Posted December 20, 2011 [img]http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/9461/390021p.jpg[/img] Lore: [b]1 Tuner + 1 non-Tuner monster[/b] [b]If this card inflicts damage to your opponent: Gain Life Points equal to the same amount. When this card leaves the field: Special Summon 1 "Ersatz Token" (Dragon-Type/FIRE/Level 6/ATK 2200/DEF 2200) in Attack Position.[/b] Tokens are cool at times, and im sure having one exactly like the 'boss' you just fought is good for you too... then again, im unsure if an exact copy (where the name Ersatz came from) is a bad thing... which is why i made the summoning conditions a tad bit harder, with only 1 tuner and 1 non... plus the ATK/DEF is a tad low too so overall, let me know what you think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 20, 2011 Report Share Posted December 20, 2011 pic is good, not great though with regards to the 1st effect, it's a lot like the card Sebek's Blessing, but at least here you don't have to be restricted to direct attacks only as for the token, nothing really wrong with that, maybe consider some restrictions on it so it's not used right away for synchro food or something like that, but that's your call Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galkin Posted December 20, 2011 Report Share Posted December 20, 2011 Well, I don't find 2200 to be much, most things will kill it easily and the heal effect I don't find to be too helpful, but its nice. The token effect does allows it to "escape" any removal effect once, since its the same monster, so it can be used with dark hole or torriental tribute and it makes this card's presence a little hard to get rid off. But I don't find it overall great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFG Studios Posted December 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2011 well, thanks you guys... i upped the stats to what seemed reasonable for an always attacking monster... so hopefully thats better... plus im still considering the restrictions on the Token... but thats an unknown still Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guuu1234 Posted December 21, 2011 Report Share Posted December 21, 2011 A restriction on the token? I don't find it necssary wth this card. It's overall effect isn't WOW, so it's not like the token gives that big of an advantage. Plus with only 2500 Atk, the monster ill be easy to rid of and if your opponent isn't careless, neither will the token. Asmodeus is miles strongr then this cards and it brings out 2 tokens with a different immunity. What maks this card strong is how you can control the token use. But agan, 2500 isn't much. You have a nice, balanced card that puts another interesting level 6 into the mix. good job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFG Studios Posted December 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2011 i know its not much, but still, its a level 6... and with a presence that doesnt go away for an extra turn basically... and i guess the token shouldnt have any restrictions since i want it to have a perk of its own too... so i guess it'll have to be treated like normal... anyway, glad you like it though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 21, 2011 Report Share Posted December 21, 2011 [quote name='Galkin' timestamp='1324424903' post='5720102'] Well, I don't find 2200 to be much, most things will kill it easily and the heal effect I don't find to be too helpful, but its nice. The token effect does allows it to "escape" any removal effect once, since its the same monster, so it can be used with dark hole or torriental tribute and it makes this card's presence a little hard to get rid off. But I don't find it overall great. [/quote] well 2200 is enough to handle most lv5 monsters, though still not enough against lv6s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.