joex486 Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 [img]http://i.imgur.com/lHAUj.jpg[/img] [center]Discuss.[/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 Apart from the fact that switch a few cards round and you could have got Horakthys in that duel, Obelisk is awesome. Too bad I prefer Osiris now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joex486 Posted December 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 I haven't played too many duels with this deck, but so far, I am actually finding Obelisk to be better just because of his protection. I haven't faced any decks that were very good yet though, so I don't know which I will come to prefer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 Obelisk is better in Frogs, while Slifer does it in Gadgets, imo. The difference isn't too bad. /olly That crappy Fishborg Blaster replace.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NumberCruncher Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 I weep for Substitoad. If Ronintoadin hadn't messed up the meta, this would still be @ 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 [quote name='NumberCruncher' timestamp='1324668328' post='5725561'] I weep for Substitoad. If Ronintoadin hadn't messed up the meta, this would still be @ 3. [/quote] Except it was Substitoad which was broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NumberCruncher Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 [quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1324668636' post='5725564'] Except it was Substitoad which was broken. [/quote] Yes, but it wouldn't have been broken enough to warrant a ban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 [quote name='NumberCruncher' timestamp='1324668758' post='5725566'] Yes, but it wouldn't have been broken enough to warrant a ban. [/quote] That was still Mass Driver's fault. Mass Driver was bad card design anyway, regardless of how good it was, so that should have been banned too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NumberCruncher Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 [quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1324668816' post='5725568'] That was still Mass Driver's fault. Mass Driver was bad card design anyway, regardless of how good it was, so that should have been banned too. [/quote] Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.