Mrs Rarity Posted January 6, 2012 Report Share Posted January 6, 2012 [size=4][color=#0000ff]I wanted to start making cards again, or try to since I'm not that good with creating them. [/color][/size] [size=4][color=#0000ff]I would like to know how I did, if they are balanced or just good? Rating them on a scale of 1-10 would be sweet too. Thank you~ [/color][/size] [size=4][color=#0000ff][img]http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/378116_262796603784501_100001624904868_688017_321422836_n.jpg[/img][/color][/size] [size=4][color=#000000][b][size=3][img]http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/374354_262785907118904_100001624904868_688000_109277324_n.jpg[/img][/size][/b][/color][/size] [size=4][color=#000000][b][size=3][img]http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/374836_262209373843224_100001624904868_686220_550840217_n.jpg[/img][/size][/b][/color][/size] [size=4][color=#000000][b][size=3][img]http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/399611_262781773785984_100001624904868_687990_1601942419_n.jpg[/img][/size][/b][/color][/size] [size=4][color=#000000][b][size=3][img]http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/403678_262778017119693_100001624904868_687989_1053213566_n.jpg[/img][/size][/b][/color][/size] [size=4][color=#000000][b][size=3][img]http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/375197_262800300450798_100001624904868_688032_1786053724_n.jpg[/img][/size][/b][/color][/size] [size=4][color=#000000][b][size=3][img]http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/393616_262192770511551_100001624904868_686176_323142390_n.jpg[/img][/size][/b][/color][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101100111000 Posted January 6, 2012 Report Share Posted January 6, 2012 Card 1: 7/10. The card itself is alright, EXCEPT for the card's second effect. Instead of stating "If this card is destroyed by a...", state "If this card is targeted by a ..."; it rids us of the confusion of wondering "how does this effect work if it's already destroyed?" Aside from this, you have some card grammar errors that can easily be fixed, but, for the most part Card 2: 8/10. The card is decent, a bit strong in effect, but negligible. My main discrepancy here, again, are minor card grammar errors that don't necessarily affect our understanding of its effect. Card 3: 9/10. To be honest, the tribute idea is nice, and the fact it gains a bit of ATK during the Battle Phase. Some rather minor grammar stuff, but no buggie, this is a good card. Card 4: 9.5/10. Really good card, although you don't really have to state "points" if you're increasing the ATK/DEF. Card 5: 9.5/10. A BIT op, but this is what Yu-Gi-Oh's about; getting the advantage. Card 6: 9.5/10. Really good card, but again, don't gotta state "points" if it's about ATK/DEF. Card 7: 9.5/10. Great card, but, two things, 1. Try 400 ATK vs. 500 ATK and 2. "destroy it" vs. "destroy that". Besides that, I really like this card's effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 6, 2012 Report Share Posted January 6, 2012 Orode: 3000 def is a bit too high for lv7, well one that's special summoned this way at least, drop it lower Bayard's atk gain you should put a limit to how much its atk can get, otherwise it might get too high Feip is meh for just atk gain Yoazh's effect is essentially Ring of Destruction + Ring of Defense (though the burn isn't as big) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Rarity Posted January 7, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Thanks you guys, I will fix those errors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.