Jump to content

Draw me like one of your French Gladiators


Stratus G.

Recommended Posts

[quote name='Relius Clover' timestamp='1327201674' post='5775167']
It's @1 becaue 3 1000 burning walls isn't pleasant, but Reaper is better overall. It's not a -1 Burn, and you must be REALLY bad to compare it to a non-searchable bad -1.

NO ONE RUNS THINGS THAT TARGET THAT DON'T DESTROY, except, like, Glads ._.

Anytime Reaper dies, Marshmallon would, too, sans the mirror, and both are crap in said mirror =/
[/quote]

I thought Mind Control was still a staple.

Reaper is better than Marshmallon, but Marshmallon doesn't have a weakness in the form of a self-destruct clause, has no reason to ever be changed to ATK position (Reaper's effect almost encourages it to be switched to ATK mode at some point), and burns for 1000. It was probably much more dangerous when Book of Moon was at 3, but there's no reason to have it at anything other than 1. Stall isn't good for the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Stratus G.' timestamp='1327132321' post='5773647']
"[b]November 21st, 2011[/b]"
Hardly considered our meta now.

And I never said the 1000LP burn was a better effect. Just that the non-destruct ability was far better than Spirit Reaper's. Most cards [b]target [/b]now, and target for the [b]most minor of things[/b].
Marshmallon sits and can't be bothered if targeted, unless it's being removed by something.

Spirit Reaper-Opponent targets with something they would have used for their own monster(Example:Safe zone, Forbidden Lance, etc.)

If your willing to attack directly with Spirit Reaper, then your willing to allow your opponent the opportunity to game you within their turn against the Attack-position Reaper, which will happen more likely than you think. Even if they just draw into a 1 card hand with no field.
Anyway, opinions are opinions. I have mine and you have yours, Neither of us are technically wrong about these points.

Back to the topic at hand before this swerves more off road.
[/quote]

Did you really just say that more people use Safe Zone than Maxx "C"

get the f*** out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OP made me lose the will to live. He's so f***ing bad. Why would you play a 300/200 with 1000 Burn over something which hits your opponent's hand advantage? Also the targetting thing is nearly completely irrelevant, because even if something targets Marshmallon it will probably die anyway, unless you lance Marshmallon. And if you do that, you're bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Professor Kokonoe' timestamp='1327258659' post='5775896']
OP made me lose the will to live. He's so f***ing bad. Why would you play a 300/200 with 1000 Burn over something which hits your opponent's hand advantage? Also the targetting thing is nearly completely irrelevant, because even if something targets Marshmallon it will probably die anyway, unless you lance Marshmallon. And if you do that, you're bad.
[/quote]

BALLS IN YOUR f***ing MOUTH

Anyway, I'll link you to the deck forum from one of the best yugioh forums out there: [url="http://duelistgroundz.com/index.php?showforum=11"]http://duelistground...hp?showforum=11[/url]

See how this has multiple maxx c's?

And safe zone doesnt kill reaper iirc

ALSO JACK WITT CLAUSE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='- Zeal -' timestamp='1327267588' post='5776133']
Burei.

But yeah, reaper > marshmallon. Reaper can minus your opponent when they're down, making it harder for them to come back. 1000 burn is nice, but not really that necessary.
[/quote]

Nobody f***ing runs that s***.

Only things are Econ and Mind Con.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Stratus G.' timestamp='1327281950' post='5776612']
Er, No why?
[/quote]

I'm pretty sure you did.

You said that Maxx "C" isn't commonly used.

And you said something about commonly used cards that target, like Forbidden Lance and Safe Zone.

Nobody uses either of those except in obscure decks like GBs and s***.

And Safe Zone doesn't destroy Reaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Professor Kokonoe' timestamp='1327324258' post='5777007']
Aren't Tigerless GBs better? I always thought they were.

-3 Tiger

+1 A Hero Lives
+2 Warning/Bottomless
[/quote]
Tiger = instant whatever glad you want.

Is Prisma really worth all of these cards? Like, all the Elemental Hero cards? Once you get Prisma, won't they be dead draws?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...