.P3 Posted January 25, 2012 Report Share Posted January 25, 2012 [left][font="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"][size="4"]A Quick Note: [/size][/font][font="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"][size=3]Sorry if I am a little rusty; I haven't created a card in ages and this idea has been banging in my head for a while and when I say ages I mean like August last year; so Constructive Criticism would be nice and the Image means nothing to the cards level as It can easily be changed.[/size][/font][/left] [left][img]http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/9500/286222.jpg[/img][/left] [left]Effect: Each of these effects can be activated once per turn:[/left] [left]● When your opponent's monster declares an attack, you can select it, then banish this card from play and negate the attack.[/left] ● During your Main Phase, You can target 1 face-up monster you control; the target is treated as a Warrior-Type, until this card is destroyed. ● If this face-up card would be destroyed, you can banish 1 Warrior-Type from your Graveyard instead. If any of these effects are activated its original ATK and DEF are halved until your next Standby Phase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 25, 2012 Report Share Posted January 25, 2012 this is already weak in stats for a lv9 monster before I go further though, I'm curious as to why you didn't say you can only activate ONE of these effects per turn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.P3 Posted January 25, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2012 I don't know; I just felt like doing something different I suppose. As for the weakness I know; I tried to make it balanced but failed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 25, 2012 Report Share Posted January 25, 2012 I'd drop the level to 8, then make its atk 2500 or something That's technically still not all that strong, but it's much better than 2000, try that first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.P3 Posted January 25, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2012 It was at 3000 but I saw that as Overpowered and I had a small Dilemma But yeah I'll give that a try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 25, 2012 Report Share Posted January 25, 2012 well 3000 atk is fine for lv8 as well you know, so obviously it'd be ok at lv9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.P3 Posted January 25, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2012 Okie; Well then I'll work on it. Thanks Rag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 26, 2012 Report Share Posted January 26, 2012 when you're done with the updating, just let us know, k? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.P3 Posted January 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2012 Yeah sure, Will do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.