FindingTheEverlight Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 I should limit it more, but think of how many times your opponent is going to do this per turn. [img]http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/585/40256.jpg[/img] The lore is easy enough to read, but if there's any requests to see it, then I'll post it. Another picture drawn by my friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 situational, but it works it's nice to see FIRE getting more support personally I would have said 2 or more cards on the field for greater flexibility, since it's going to the graveyard anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 "If an effect activates that would destroy 2 or more monsters you control: You can send this card from your hand to the Graveyard; negate the effect of the card and destroy it. You can activate this effect during either player's turn." IMO, only deck I'd use it in is Watts. Also... Starlight Road is better. Cause you get Stardust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 This is so bad. :l Why would you play this when barely anything destroys 2 or more of your monsters any more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1328040913' post='5792064'] it's nice to see FIRE getting more support personally I would have said 2 or more cards on the field for greater flexibility, since it's going to the graveyard anyway [/quote]But it's NOT FIRE support... :\ But, Everlight, he's right, you should change it to cards instead of just monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='Wraith' timestamp='1328041045' post='5792069'] But it's NOT FIRE support... :\ But, Everlight, he's right, you should change it to cards instead of just monsters. [/quote] of course not, but it has its uses in supporting FIRE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1328041089' post='5792072'] of course not, but it has its uses in supporting FIRE [/quote] Name them. And tell me how it would support FIRE directly, not just generic decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1328041089' post='5792072'] of course not, but it has its uses in supporting FIRE [/quote] [quote name='Professor Kokonoe' timestamp='1328041140' post='5792076'] Name them. And tell me how it would support FIRE directly, not just generic decks. [/quote]^This Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='Professor Kokonoe' timestamp='1328041140' post='5792076'] Name them. And tell me how it would support FIRE directly, not just generic decks. [/quote] I didn't say it'd support FIRE DIRECTLY, Koko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FindingTheEverlight Posted January 31, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 Yeah, I think that making it for all cards instead of directing it towards monsters, that would make better, that was what I was originally going to do, but I felt people would think of it as being o/p'd. As for Fire support, it wasn't really intentional, it was more-or-less it going with the picture. The name of the card also derives from what my friend actually named the picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 in terms of the naming part, I can only get why you put sunset in there. Why Hellfire? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FindingTheEverlight Posted January 31, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1328041440' post='5792092'] in terms of the naming part, I can only get why you put sunset in there. Why Hellfire? [/quote] It's the name of the character, she writes stories or something like that. Idk, I was just going by what she named it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.