Bradley Dahlberg Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 [img]http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/8081/549730.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 you should have said all OTHER spellcasters gain 1000 atk, at 4000 atk it's just too much. Personally even that might be too much for spellcasters 2nd effect reminds me of Ring of Destruction + Ring of Defense on your opponent, he/she just doesn't lose the monster to the graveyard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 IMO, someone would be hard-pressed to want to melee anything while there's a 4000 atk spellcaster out But who knows, maybe someone gets FGD or the like So aside from being a beatstick, it's a predictable attack-negator, making the effect damage bit nearly useless, because no one with half a brain will attack it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xi-3 Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 Yeah, I'd have to kill it with a spell or trap or a monster that negates other monsters' effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.