Mardochee Louis Posted February 24, 2012 Report Share Posted February 24, 2012 [img]http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/7369/556030.jpg[/img]Explain In Full Details If You Think This Card Would Work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akeno_Ederis_17 Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 this is very OP.. remember that future fusion exist in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YuichiHokuto Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 This is even more OP'ed than Chaos Emperor Dragon * max. original ATK is 5,000 * destroying all cards on opponent's field AND hand is VERY OP. * 6,000 ATK, unaffected by card effect..... so how we can get rid of this? * Easy summoning conditions for such a beater. It wants minimally 5 monsters, and even so, Future Fusion ensures it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blatch Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 Oh my. I immediately knew something was wrong when I saw that it had 6000 ATK... and DEF. If you're going to make a monster like this, you should probably offer [i]5[/i] Beast-Warriors to Fusion Summon it, and even then, I would still replace the effects with ones that are more balanced. Maybe you could even add a negative effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CameronBarton Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 If it only takes 2 monsters to fusion summon it, maybe you should bring the ATK down to 5000, bring the DEF down to 0 and give it the Goblin Attack Force effect? After it attacks, it's switched to defense position until the end of your next turn?Also, forgot to mention to get rid of that "unaffected by all cards" and "Destroys every card your opponent has in their hand and on the field". As powerful as you want it, it NEEDS to have some sort of drawback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.