Yogg-Saron Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 [center]No snazzy introductions or back story to this card. As, I feel most don't need them as long as you took the time and care to actually make the card, let the viewer decide the pros/cons of the card(s), instead of listing them yourself.[/center] [center]Art by that sexy ass Father Wolf[/center] [center][img]http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/9231/1812r.jpg[/img][/center] [center][b][u]Effect/Lore[/u][/b][/center] [center]During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent. If this card inflicts damage in this way your opponent randomly discards 1 card.[/center] [center][size=2]*Due to complaints this is no longer a Gemini monster[/size][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 Piercing is fine it's not really much for just discarding though. It'd be better if you got to choose a card from your opponent's hand and discard that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 Very, very underpowered. Would never be used. On the other hand, if it was not a Gemini, it would be a very good card to play since it isn't slow and can start causing mayhem when your opponent is sitting behind a Spirit Reaper. As it is now though, it is very underwhelming to say the least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101100111000 Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 There are plenty of cards that just do piercing. I don't really find anything wrong with this kind of effect. Sure, some decks will abuse the discards (like DWs), but there'll always be something that will abuse something else. Edit: *notices Gemini, facepalms* If this card were a regular effect monster... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gαr Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 nothing we haven't seen. and whats with the name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted February 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 It is mainly just a card to see Geminis get more play. Which wouldn't happen anyways with any new support that comes out, unless they get a beastly draw card. Owait, card idea. The name is well, idk. Just put some random stuff in there and I wanted something short, simple, and sweat. Not some completely thought out word or something. Honestly, I could just call it Gemini Flame Warrior or something. But that would be to generic. [size=1]inb4 sum1 makes Gemini Flame Warrior.[/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 [quote name='Monsieur Léo' timestamp='1330207771' post='5840516'] Very, very underpowered. Would never be used. On the other hand, if it was not a Gemini, it would be a very good card to play since it isn't slow and can start causing mayhem when your opponent is sitting behind a Spirit Reaper. As it is now though, it is very underwhelming to say the least. [/quote] It is already stated by Leo, should be not a Gemini, if you insist on making it Gemini. Make it have 2000-2100 ATK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted February 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 No longer a Gemini monster due to complaints. Which saddens me but meh, maybe I can make a Gemini monster that won't irk people so much next time Also, increased ATK and decreased DEF. Thinking about taking it back down to 1800 but not sure. What do you guys think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 Now the card is somewhat playable. Not sure if it would see any play, since it doesn't have 200 DEF (Rekindling abuse) and would not necessarily flow with any deck. Card is good, but sadly the format isn't built in a way that it can thrive the way that you want it to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 Ewwww. It's pretty much staple in Anti-Meta because it gives Anti-Meta even more hand disruption than needed, only beaten by Wind-Up loops. 1900 ATK runs over a lot of stuff if you start with it, and twinning it with a Rai-Oh on field and a ton of traps pretty much will guarantee you game. And it's searchable. I'm tempted to say give it 1800 ATK and make it Pyro to balance it. And give it 200 DEF so it just becomes a good tech in 200 DEF Anti-Meta. Yes, it does exist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted February 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 Fixed for all of you Rekindling trolls. Also decreased ATK to 1800, the original ATK. Keeping it Warrior so it would see more play because of cards like RoTA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.