MORPHINGJARFORTHEWIN Posted February 28, 2012 Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 Here is another(more exciting, hopefully) card to go with "Burn". [color="#ff0000"][img]http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/5488/355616.jpg[/img][/color] [size=5][color=#ff0000]LORE: [color=#ff0000]Destroy this card if "Burn" is not on the field. You can Special Summon this card by banishing a FIRE- monster in your hand. Once per turn, when your opponent takes battle damage, they must discard 6 cards from their hand. They draw 2 cards. If they cannot or chose not to do this, inflict 500 damage for each card they did not discard. If this card were to leave the field, Tribute a monster instead.[/color][/color][/size] [size=5][size=4][color=#000000][color=#000000][img]http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/5488/355616.jpg[/img][/color][/color][/size][/size] [size=5][size=4][size=5][color=#ff0000]LORE:[color=#ff0000]During your End Phase, inflict 400 damage to your opponent for every card in their hand.[/color][/color][/size][/size][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 28, 2012 Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 I'll just do the monster one it's easy to summon to the field the burn effect for this could be huge, like 2000 or more however it is too easy to pull off because it applies to battle AND effect damage choose ONE, not both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MORPHINGJARFORTHEWIN Posted February 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 edited yo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 28, 2012 Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 personally even then I think you should lower the level down to 5 2000 atk is too weak for lv6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MORPHINGJARFORTHEWIN Posted February 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1330399344' post='5845581'] personally even then I think you should lower the level down to 5 2000 atk is too weak for lv6 [/quote]ok. Quick question: for the new clause, do I still have to put 10 words when I say edited? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 28, 2012 Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 I doubt that, but even so it's only 10 words Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MORPHINGJARFORTHEWIN Posted February 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 EDITED: I also changed the burn to 400, I think 500 is too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 28, 2012 Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 that's fine too, easier NON-OTK setup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MORPHINGJARFORTHEWIN Posted February 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1330399876' post='5845604'] that's fine too, easier NON-OTK setup [/quote] Yeah, I figured if someone had a good hand, they had to give it up or lose 3000 LP, which would suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 28, 2012 Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 not just a good hand, as long as they have enough cards in it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MORPHINGJARFORTHEWIN Posted February 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1330400337' post='5845619'] not just a good hand, as long as they have enough cards in it [/quote]Yeah, and if you discard all your cards, your next turn, you'll be forced to take atleast 2500 burn, wich isnt that much worse than 2000, but it's still better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 28, 2012 Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 yeah I mean in the case with Card Destruction, you may discard, but then you get to draw again. Here you don't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MORPHINGJARFORTHEWIN Posted February 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1330400585' post='5845627'] yeah I mean in the case with Card Destruction, you may discard, but then you get to draw again. Here you don't [/quote] so should I make it that opponent can draw again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 28, 2012 Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 yeah but don't make him/her draw TOO many Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MORPHINGJARFORTHEWIN Posted February 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 I meant draw the same amount that was discarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 28, 2012 Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 but then it'll get TOO similar to Card Destruction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MORPHINGJARFORTHEWIN Posted February 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1330403754' post='5845687'] but then it'll get TOO similar to Card Destruction [/quote]Ok, then just two? Its probably the amount they discarded, anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 28, 2012 Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 yeah 2 is good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MORPHINGJARFORTHEWIN Posted February 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 edited Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 28, 2012 Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 then you did well for it, except for the blurry monster pic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MORPHINGJARFORTHEWIN Posted February 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1330404936' post='5845717'] then you did well for it, except for the blurry monster pic [/quote]oh its supposed to be oil painting or something lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 28, 2012 Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 I see. You know if there's a way to unblur it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MORPHINGJARFORTHEWIN Posted February 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1330407813' post='5845802'] I see. You know if there's a way to unblur it? [/quote]no I mean its supposed to look like that. I could change it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 28, 2012 Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 is that what you'll do now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daigusto Sphreez Posted February 28, 2012 Report Share Posted February 28, 2012 Looks overpowered to me, even after rebalancing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.