Pyromancer of the Sun

[R3mixKillah]

 

Once per turn, If this card would be destroyed, Special Summon 1 level 3 or below FIRE monster from the graveyard until the End Phase instead. That monster cannot attack and cannot be used as a Synchro material for a Synchro Summon. You can halve this cards ATK; Inflict damage to your opponent equal to the halved ATK.

 

 

 

Should have been a Spellcaster-type.....oh well i dont care.

[REvan342]

.."if this would be destroyed...." should read: "... if this monster would be destroyed..."

 

I actually like this card better as a psychic than a spell caster ( only because i think spell casters are over-rated)

 

This card would be a bit better if the ATK was 1600 and DEF of 0, just so the "halved ATK" effect would have more of a bite to it.

Overalll a good support monster.

[Durandamon]

Also, instant Leviathan Dragon.

[REvan342]

Also, instant Leviathan Dragon.

 

very true thnx for pointing that out XD

[R3mixKillah]

Also, instant Leviathan Dragon.

 

I honestly wasnt thinking about leviathan dragon while i was creating this...I was however thinking about leviair to be honest.

This is a simple fire support card and i might take REvan342's advice and make this cards ATK a lil higher to make the burn more sufficient.

[Andrew Long]

"This is a simple fire support card"

if so why is it not a pyro type??

[Zyzzyzus]

if so why is it not a pyro type??

 

Fire doesn't always have to be Pyro, and Pyro doesn't always mean Fire.

 

Makes sense to be Psychic type, if you think of Pyrokinesis.

[REvan342]

if so why is it not a pyro type??

 

It dosent have to nessasarily be a pyro type to be a fire support. fire/pyros are (in my opinion) less useful than monsters who are fire/(insert type), because most other fire support cards effect pyros and fires. I think it was a smart move making it a type other than pyro (idk if pyros are even viable anymore) hope this clarifies

[R3mixKillah]

REvan is right in saying pyros have very low amount of support..atleast compared to most other types..That does only give it more of a reason to make a Pyro support...however the reason why this isnt Pyro is simply because it really wouldnt change how this card works. Its suppose to be FIRE support and when i say FIRE i mean the attribute and not the type....ofcourse depending on what type i put in it would have supports for this card itself , but that doesnt change its normal role... In fact making it a Pyro gives it more of a reason for being FIRE support since FIRE and Pyro generally come together in burn decks. But like REvan said Pyro doesnt have much support and is less useful than FIRE and most other types mixed with it.

[Andrew Long]

Fire doesn't always have to be Pyro, and Pyro doesn't always mean Fire.

 

Makes sense to be Psychic type, if you think of Pyrokinesis.

 

first of all - Pyrokinesis is not a real word due to the fact it was a phrase coined by horror novelist Stephen King

and made up of 2 greek words

πῦρ & κίνησις

 

second i was just asking why you choose is all i was wonder your thinking behind it??

[Zyzzyzus]

All words are coined, the validity of any word can be brought into question with that logic.

 

On topic:

In fact making it a Pyro gives it more of a reason for being FIRE support since FIRE and Pyro generally come together in burn decks.

 

Maybe you should make fire monsters and support that focuses on something other than burn? I think Laval is the only fire archetype that doesn't completely focus on burn and attack strength.

[REvan342]

first of all - Pyrokinesis is not a real word due to the fact it was a phrase coined by horror novelist Stephen King

and made up of 2 greek words

πῦρ & κίνησις

 

second i was just asking why you choose is all i was wonder your thinking behind it??

 

 

 

py·ro·ki·ne·sis

   /ˌpaɪroʊkɪˈnisɪs, -kaɪ-/ Show Spelled[pahy-roh-ki-nee-sis, -kahy-] Show IPA

 

noun (in science fiction)

the ability to set objects or people on fire through the concentration of psychic power.

 

Origin:

pyro- + (tele)kinesis

Related forms

py·ro·ki·net·ic <a onmousedown="spk(this,{lk:'nx1fkx',en:'wotdau',io:'0',b:'wotd',tp:'lrl',m:'wotdau'})" href="#"></a><a target="_blank" href="http://dictionary.reference.com/audio.html/lunaWAV/P09/P0969200"><img border="0" src="http://sp.dictionary.com/dictstatic/g/d/speaker.gif"></a> /ˌpaɪroʊkɪˈnɛtɪk, -kaɪ-/ Show Spelled[pahy-roh-ki-net-ik, -kahy-] Show IPA, adjective

Dictionary.com Unabridged

Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2012.

 

Pyrokinesis is in the dictionary, and has been for longer than my parents have been alive....

and he choose psychic type, so that it wouldent be just another monotinus fire/pyro... you get points for creativity as well as card design =)

[Andrew Long]

All words are coined, the validity of any word can be brought into question with that logic.

 

On topic:

 

 

Maybe you should make fire monsters and support that focuses on something other than burn? I think Laval is the only fire archetype that doesn't completely focus on burn and attack strength.

 

 

words are not coined "direct translation - made up " and the logilc of a word cant be called into question it is only the understanding of a word that can. (quote following is from a phd linguist prof) His point to me was that a dictionary is static and language is dynamic. His further point was that if a community of people uses a word, and “we all understand” what that word means, then that in and of itself qualifies the word as a word – it is legitimate language. People define language, not dictionaries. just cos one man made up a word does not make it a real word!

 

 

 

ANd if its not in the oxford Dictionary i does count posting a common "house copy" is like saying i got a bike but i read the argo cataloge to see how to put it together.

[Zyzzyzus]

His point to me was that a dictionary is static and language is dynamic. His further point was that if a community of people uses a word, and “we all understand” what that word means, then that in and of itself qualifies the word as a word

 

Indeed, you have proven that "pyrokinesis" is a word, since many people do use it as a word, and I'm assuming we all understand what it means.

Last off-topic post for me.

[REvan342]

words are not coined "direct translation - made up " and the logilc of a word cant be called into question it is only the understanding of a word that can. (quote following is from a phd linguist prof) His point to me was that a dictionary is static and language is dynamic. His further point was that if a community of people uses a word, and “we all understand” what that word means, then that in and of itself qualifies the word as a word – it is legitimate language. People define language, not dictionaries. just cos one man made up a word does not make it a real word!

 

your logic fails to support you. people "made-up" our lanquages. all words had to be coined before the became legitamate words. and the basic definition of a dictionary is: a compilation of words, defined for a lanquage. if its in the dictionary, its a real word.

 

and youve got us all spamming.... so please get back on ssubject

[Andrew Long]

i enjoy reading your google failed attemps, it does make me giggle. the word you say many people use and the term i was quoting from was stating "many people" over 1000. in your flawed thinking insanana made up by a pop singer in a reality tv show is also a word, since over a 100 people know the word and understand the meaning he put behind it.

 

rev - to your point you fail on your own post - anything that the action of mind on matter, in which objects are caused to move or change state as a result of mental concentration upon them, is called telekinesis. bursting into flames would be classed as a change in state.

 

people understand what you are copy and pasting from google.

 

i still like the card, just was asking why he did not cos pyro.

[REvan342]

i enjoy reading your google failed attemps, it does make me giggle. the word you say many people use and the term i was quoting from was stating "many people" over 1000. in your flawed thinking insanana made up by a pop singer in a reality tv show is also a word, since over a 100 people know the word and understand the meaning he put behind it.

 

rev - to your point you fail on your own post - anything that the action of mind on matter, in which objects are caused to move or change state as a result of mental concentration upon them, is called telekinesis. bursting into flames would be classed as a change in state.

 

people understand what you are copy and pasting from google.

 

i still like the card, just was asking why he did not cos pyro.

 

QUIT SPAMMING.... this has nothing to do with the current post, or this entire forum. do it again, and youll get reported.

[Andrew Long]

so you expect me to read incorrect posts and not correct them. that is not spamming that is informing!!! by your thinking what you are doing, i will use a WoW term "trolling." using your posts to try and P**s me off into posting something i could be banned for. i think it is past someone USA, "which explanes alot" bed time. i simply asked on all my posts why he did not choose to make it pyro??

[REvan342]

so you expect me to read incorrect posts and not correct them. that is not spamming that is informing!!! by your thinking what you are doing, i will use a WoW term "trolling." using your posts to try and P**s me off into posting something i could be banned for. i think it is past someone USA, "which explanes alot" bed time. i simply asked on all my posts why he did not choose to make it pyro??

 

But you went on a rant about pyrokinesis..... a term not even remotely relavent to the topic at hand, which is considered spam.

[Andrew Long]

I did not, i answered the first guys post about pyrokinesis, so before you start ranting and raving about he said, and he said and then he said. i think you should first read the post and work out what has been said. before gobbing off it just makes the rest of us pitty you.

 

 

also i still am wondering why he did not make it pyro??

[Guest Yuzuru Otonashi]

Ending this farce. Sorry TC.