WWECENA Posted March 17, 2012 Report Share Posted March 17, 2012 enjoy my new card and i will do another card later effect: Activate only when the ATK of the attacking monster your opponent control is higher than the ATK of the attacked monster you control, reduce the ATK of the attacking monster to 0, during the End Phase you take damage equal to the amount of ATK reduced by this card effect. quick note ( ok his is how this card work your opponent attack with monster that has 2000 ATK your monster has 1500 ATK you activate this card your opponent monster attack become 0 so he gonna take 1500 damage and his monster will be destroyed and at the end phase you will take 2000 damage to your life point ) hope that explains it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanoamorse Posted March 17, 2012 Report Share Posted March 17, 2012 the first part of the wording hurts my brain, change it to something along the lines of "when your opponent declares an attack with a monster whos attack is greater than your targeted monster." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWECENA Posted March 17, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2012 the first part of the wording hurts my brain, change it to something along the lines of "when your opponent declares an attack with a monster whos attack is greater than your targeted monster." hmmm let me think ..... no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zyzzyzus Posted March 17, 2012 Report Share Posted March 17, 2012 First bit is redundant, isn't it? Even if the attacking monster had an attack lower than the monster it's attacking, this effect wouldn't stop something like Grinder Golem + Inferno Tempest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dworkin Posted March 17, 2012 Report Share Posted March 17, 2012 Dude. That lore is nuts. Fix.the first part of the wording hurts my brain, change it to something along the lines of "when your opponent declares an attack with a monster whos attack is greater than your targeted monster."This. Oh god this. Aside from your terrible OCG and blatent rudeness, this card seems quite balanced. Wouldnt see much use though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWECENA Posted March 17, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2012 Aside from your terrible OCG and blatent rudeness, this card seems quite balanced. Wouldnt see much use though. name one OCG and why wouldnt see much use ? First bit is redundant, isn't it? Even if the attacking monster had an attack lower than the monster it's attacking, this effect wouldn't stop something like Grinder Golem + Inferno Tempest. let me ask you something what Inferno Tempest.has to do with this card effect if you answer i will give you point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dworkin Posted March 17, 2012 Report Share Posted March 17, 2012 OCG=Official Card Grammar. And its the first line. And might I point out that your being extremely rude? It wouldnt see much use because it is outclassed by so much. Mirror Force, Fiendish Chain, Dimensional Prison, heck even Magic Cylinder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zyzzyzus Posted March 17, 2012 Report Share Posted March 17, 2012 let me ask you something what Inferno Tempest.has to do with this card effect if you answer i will give you pointSince you don't want to change the wording of "Activate only when the ATK of the attacking monster your opponent control is higher than the ATK of the attacked monster you control", I'm suggesting that you get rid of that part, because you wouldn't activate this card against a monster with a lower attack anyway. I gave Inferno Tempest as an example, since it requires 3000 or more damage to be taken in one attack, and reducing the monster with the lower attack to 0 ATK wouldn't stop the activation of the card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWECENA Posted March 17, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2012 Since you don't want to change the wording of "Activate only when the ATK of the attacking monster your opponent control is higher than the ATK of the attacked monster you control", I'm suggesting that you get rid of that part, because you wouldn't activate this card against a monster with a lower attack anyway. I gave Inferno Tempest as an example, since it requires 3000 or more damage to be taken in one attack, and reducing the monster with the lower attack to 0 ATK wouldn't stop the activation of the card. oh i see what you trying to say lool but the only way to activate Inferno Tempest is when i take 3000 or more battle damage the damage i will take is not battle damage it's direct damage so Inferno Tempest will not be activated =_= OCG=Official Card Grammar. And its the first line. And might I point out that your being extremely rude? It wouldnt see much use because it is outclassed by so much. Mirror Force, Fiendish Chain, Dimensional Prison, heck even Magic Cylinder.i know what OCG mean and i'm not rude i'm just asking what is the OCG so i can fix it and all the trap card you said has nothing alike with my card effect most of them not even a Continuous trap and mirror force will always be in everyone deck no matter what deck he run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BacoTaco Posted March 17, 2012 Report Share Posted March 17, 2012 is it a payment or effect damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dworkin Posted March 17, 2012 Report Share Posted March 17, 2012 With the exception of Fiendish, Cont. Traps are bad due to a three-MST one-Heavy format. And you already have a fix, Zy gave it to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sasder47 Posted March 17, 2012 Report Share Posted March 17, 2012 eh too confusing and redundant, i agree with Dworkin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWECENA Posted March 17, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2012 is it a payment or effect damage. read the quick note eh too confusing and redundant, i agree with Dworkin it's not my problem you don't understand read my quick note Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Yuzuru Otonashi Posted March 17, 2012 Report Share Posted March 17, 2012 Yeah, this is stupid because you wouldn't even accept someone helping make your card more clear without changing the eff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.