lukem Posted March 24, 2012 Report Share Posted March 24, 2012 Thanks: Free Image Upload, ฟุตบอล Thanks: Free Image Upload, ฟุตบอล please comment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordEcchi Posted March 24, 2012 Report Share Posted March 24, 2012 You should choose a single cost and use it, instead of stating "pay 500 life points or discard a card from your hand or extra deck" and "shuffle [...] to your deck or banish them" It just leads to confusion and inefficiency. The Greed Given that there are two costs, I'll do a statement for each one. Draw 4 cards, banish three of them, add one to your hand. This seems rather pointless, when I could just run a Jar of Greed and draw 1 card with no negative effects. Draw 4 cards, shuffle three back into your deck, add one to your hand. This just seems like an even more broken version of the Forbidden card "Graceful Charity", sine the cards go back into the deck to be re-used normally, and you get to look at 4 cards instead of three. I generally like to suggest way to adjust unbalanced cards, but this card is made entirely of OP, so I dunno what do say, sorry. xD Banished Exanger Given that there are multiple costs, I will so a statement for each one. Once per turn pay 500 LP to return up to two banished cards to your hand. For this, the cost is too low. I'd make it so that only one card can be drawn, and maybe even increase the life point amount. I also don't think it should be a continuous, it's a little too OP to be able to constantly return. Once per turn discard 1 card from your hand to return up to two banished cards to your hand. For this, the cost is too low. Your trading one card for two, at the very least it should be 1 for 1, and for a truly balanced card, you should have to discard two, and then return one from the banished zone. If you change the cost to 1 for 1, then it still shouldn't be a continuous for the same reasons listed above, but if you make it 2 for 1, I think it'd be alright for it to be continuous, because overuse of it would hurt you pretty badly. Once per turn discard 1 card from your extra deck to return up to two banished cards to your hand. I've never seen a card to discard from your extra deck, and it doesn't really make sense to do it at all. The extra deck is outside of the deck, you don't draw from it, it isn't included in card count, it's completely separate. Not only that, the cards in it don't even have to make sense. I could run a dragon deck and have 3 Dark Paladin in my Extra Deck. If this was commonly used as a cost I guarantee people would stack their extra deck with tons of useless Fusion and Synchro cards and the be able to cheat the system all day long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukem Posted March 24, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2012 kk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordEcchi Posted March 24, 2012 Report Share Posted March 24, 2012 As a side note, I think if you repair Banished Exanger's effect cost, it'd fit in great with My Deck since it's main focus is to play with the Banished zone xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukem Posted March 24, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2012 As a side note, I think if you repair Banished Exanger's effect cost, it'd fit in great with My Deck since it's main focus is to play with the Banished zone xDok i will do that right now my next post will have it ause you cant post images on replies (: :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekazu4u Posted March 24, 2012 Report Share Posted March 24, 2012 Don't do a card that can get ANY CARD back from banished. It will just end up being OP'd (the other is already OP'd, I established that in the old thread.) Make it only monsters and then I guess it is somewhat balanced. Also I would limit the cost to only discarding from hand. That way it is a 2 for 2. "Discarding from Extra Deck" makes no sense in the first place :| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poinl Posted March 25, 2012 Report Share Posted March 25, 2012 On a side not i would like to say that discarding from your extra deck is correct OCG, just look at the card Gale Dogra. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Yuzuru Otonashi Posted March 25, 2012 Report Share Posted March 25, 2012 On a side not i would like to say that discarding from your extra deck is correct OCG, just look at the card Gale Dogra.That's an ancient card. The correct word is SEND, as it has since been printed. Anyways, member is banned so thread is pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.