X-Metaman Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 [center][img]http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/1120/88083860.jpg[/img][/center] [center]Level 3[/center] [center]EARTH/Beast/Effect[/center] [center]When this card you control is destroyed by your opponent's card (either by battle or by card effect) and sent to your Graveyard: Shuffle this card into your Deck. Once per turn: You can target 1 face-up Attack Position "Madolce" monster you control and 1 face-up Attack Position monster your opponent controls; change the targets to face-up Defense Position. The targets cannot change their Battle Positions until the end of your opponent's next turn.[/center] [center]Last Madolce monster.[/center] [center]Discuss.[/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Sage Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 D'AAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWW. Sigh, could have been better. Best target is probably itself. It is a Mille-Feuille target, though, meaning more chances for Rank 3s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 That has got to the most adorable artwork I've seen in a long time. It definantly could have been better, but it might have some use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 No one is talking about Puddingcess with this card? Cuz that's probably its main purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greiga Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 [quote name='Aggro' timestamp='1334153841' post='5910073'] No one is talking about Puddingcess with this card? Cuz that's probably its main purpose. [/quote] Why do I want a 3100 beater in defense position? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 [quote name='Greiga te Jalokia' timestamp='1334158819' post='5910167'] Why do I want a 3100 beater in defense position? [/quote]What 3100 beater? Please don't tell me you think I meant to put Puddingcess in defense. This card CAN target itself, you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greiga Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 What are you talking about then? Empty Grave + Chateau + Manners Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 [quote name='Greiga te Jalokia' timestamp='1334159328' post='5910175'] What are you talking about then? Empty Grave + Chateau + Manners [/quote]I'm saying that you can use this, turn this and an Opponent's monster to Defense, then attack with Puddingcess to make sure you destroy an extra card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greiga Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 Oh. Here I am thinking you're referring to complicated s***. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 Awks when getting this and Puddingcess out is nigh on impossible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommanderVolt Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 what the hell, thats some serious d'awwww art. Well, was hoping for something a little more intresting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 awks when this is entirely bad. KONAMI. GIVE MY CANDY-COVERED ADORABLE THINGS GOOD SUPPORT. GOOD SUPPORT I TELL YOU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Doodle Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 I guess it makes that bunny a bit more usefull. it can now summon puddingcess and this for a rank 3. hopefully the xyz will cover for the -1 you'r getting >< but, I mean, are they purposely making this archetype bad? I can uderstand bulerusk and chevouxler (or however it's spelled like) that only work when NS'd or have rather low ATK, but Waltz for example is just stupid. Thay have a great concept, but they can be alot better if not all these (let's call it) "nerfs" (their low stats and the some-what situational effects) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoseSymphony Posted April 12, 2012 Report Share Posted April 12, 2012 [quote name='The Griff' timestamp='1334184373' post='5910719'] I guess it makes that bunny a bit more usefull. it can now summon puddingcess and this for a rank 3. hopefully the xyz will cover for the -1 you'r getting >< but, I mean, are they purposely making this archetype bad? I can uderstand bulerusk and chevouxler (or however it's spelled like) that only work when NS'd or have rather low ATK, but Waltz for example is just stupid. Thay have a great concept, but they can be alot better if not all these (let's call it) "nerfs" (their low stats and the some-what situational effects) [/quote] I can [i]sorta[/i] see the idea behind Waltz. With Chateau, you basically have an endless supply of monsters, so forcing your opponent to take 300 damage each time they attack is I suppose some kind of annoyance tactic. Not an amazing one, but whatev. ...Now that I think about it, Dark Door would be hilarious in this situation. XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.