IFF Jammer in both Monster and Spell Varieties for your Viewing Pleasure

[Stan Alda]

I'm surprised Konami hasn't come up with this yet. Then again, there's probably a good reason for that.

These cards, quite simply, force your opponent's monsters to attack each other. Unfortunately, this card is nigh-worthless if your opponent has only one monster, or no monsters at all. It's meant to hamper multi-Xyz attacks and swarms by forcing infighting between the opposing forces. Combine this with a card that forces your opponent to attack (I know they exist, but I can't name one off the top of my head) to really troll your opponent. Whether it will actually do any real damage or not is another matter.

I made two versions of this card, a Spell and a Monster. The only difference in effects is that the monster version requires your opponent to attack "IFF Jammer" if they only have 1 monster on their side of the field.

[i][b]IFF Jammer[/b][/i]
[img]http://i1236.photobucket.com/albums/ff443/El_Almhjbat_Wahd/iffjammerspell-1.jpg[/img]
SPELL/Continuous
As long as this card is on the field, your opponent must declare 1 attack on 1 monster on their side of the field during their Battle Phase. If your opponent has no monsters on their side of the field, destroy this card.

[Stan Alda]

Le bump.

[Love of Ghibli]

It reminds me a little bit of Ancient Lamp (well actually a lot like Ancient Lamp) so I don't doubt that it can be done I just worry that as a spell card in conjunction with other spell Cards (Like Savage Coliseum and Dark Door) it cause quiet a painful loop. Maybe that is what it is good.

Needless to say I like it lol

[Stan Alda]

[quote name='Beginning446' timestamp='1336542362' post='5935557']
It reminds me a little bit of Ancient Lamp (well actually a lot like Ancient Lamp) so I don't doubt that it can be done I just worry that as a spell card in conjunction with other spell Cards (Like Savage Coliseum and Dark Door) it cause quiet a painful loop. Maybe that is what it is good.

Needless to say I like it lol
[/quote]
Which do you think is better, the Monster or Spell version?

[Love of Ghibli]

Oh the spell of course less loopholes lol.

With the monster it doesn't the attack has to be first one declared. So why not hit this thing first then swing at yourself..oh wait the monster is too weak to live so once it dies then you're pretty screwed (unless you are running dark door's and such lol). Also I don't know how the monster version can last a whole turn with zero attack without some heavy assistance because I don't know how you would summon it and expect its effect to go off with out it being in attack mode. For all these reasons I love the spell more. You draw it, play it, and everything goes off smoothly.

[Stan Alda]

Got rid of the monster version.