HooksiusMaximus Posted July 15, 2012 Report Share Posted July 15, 2012 [img]http://i.imgur.com/prVpn.jpg[/img] Lore: Discard one monster card from your hand during your Main Phase 1 to select a monster you control that was Tribute Summoned this turn (this monster may not attack this turn). Your opponent must destroy cards on his/her side of the field equal to the number of monsters you sacrificed to summon the selected monster. If your opponent does not have enough cards on his/her side of the field then your opponent must discard the remaining cost from his/her hand. IOW: Let's say you tribute summoned a "Blue Eyes White Dragon" by sacrificing 2 monsters during your main phase 1. You can activate this card (during the same turn and phase) by discarding a monster card from your hand and selecting the Blue Eyes (which won't be able to attack this turn). Your opponent would then have to destroy [u]2[/u] cards on his/her side of the field (monsters and/or spells/traps) since you sacrificed [u]2[/u] monsters to summon the Blue Eyes. If your opponent only had 1 card on the field (in the above scenario) then his/her only card would be destroyed and then he/she would have to discard 1 more card from his/her hand to make up for the additional tribute. Let's say you you used "Kaiser Sea Horse" to summon your Blue Eyes, then you opponent would only have to destroy 1 card instead of two. This card's effect applies to the number of monsters that were [u]actually tributed [/u]to summon the monster, not the number of monsters that are ordinarily required to summon it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synchronized Posted July 16, 2012 Report Share Posted July 16, 2012 The new members making awesome cards is really starting to surprise me, and leave me hopeful about RC as a whole. This is brilliantly designed, and makes Tributing a bit more viable. Normally, Tribute Summons aren't used because they result in a net loss of advantage, but this can actually make some of those plays worthwhile. The discard itself is not a problem, but I don't think it should have to be a monster. I think making it any card would actually make the card a lot more playable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HooksiusMaximus Posted July 18, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2012 Good point. I guess it makes more sense to just discard any one card from your hand rather than specifically a monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.