Bloodrun Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 ok, so i know there is a new rule, so i think im doing everything right, so i got the picture from deviantart, the creator of the pic is =transfuseand here is the link: and now here is my card, tell me what you think, rate it, kill it, hate it, im ready for anything, and anyone (eh hmm) sorry excuse me: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 I like the effect, but you put in a comma where there shouldent be 1 XD"This card cannot be Specia Summond, except......"Get rid of the comma I think....I also like the pic (XD)But good work man ^_^9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted March 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 I like the effect' date=' but you put in a comma where there shouldent be 1 XD"This card cannot be Specia Summond, except......"Get rid of the comma I think....I also like the pic (XD)But good work man ^_^9/10[/quote'] no i think the comma should be there lol, ill check, becuase its emphasizing that it cant be special summoned, but your prolly right, ill check it out, and yeah i like the pic to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 I like the effect' date=' but you put in a comma where there shouldent be 1 XD"This card cannot be Specia Summond, except......"Get rid of the comma I think....I also like the pic (XD)But good work man ^_^9/10[/quote'] no i think the comma should be there lol, ill check, becuase its emphasizing that it cant be special summoned, but your prolly right, ill check it out, and yeah i like the pic to That would be so cool, ME BEING RIGHT! WOOOOO!But yeah, I think the comma isn't supposed to be there, desn'tmake seice, when you say the effect, you don't puse usually when saying it....XDAnd the holo rules XDDD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted March 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 I like the effect' date=' but you put in a comma where there shouldent be 1 XD"This card cannot be Specia Summond, except......"Get rid of the comma I think....I also like the pic (XD)But good work man ^_^9/10[/quote'] no i think the comma should be there lol, ill check, becuase its emphasizing that it cant be special summoned, but your prolly right, ill check it out, and yeah i like the pic to That would be so cool, ME BEING RIGHT! WOOOOO!But yeah, I think the comma isn't supposed to be there, desn'tmake seice, when you say the effect, you don't puse usually when saying it....XDAnd the holo rules XDDD lol indeed, but you know what, i think i messed something else up as well, if you can find it, ill give you a cookie lol, ( and yes no dur he holo rules man, you beat me in two things now, nice job, wait three, you have more friends then me lol) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 I think it should say "By" the effect of "The book of life" XDAnd, you but attack, not ATK twice >_>The sentance is just plain wrong, whe this card desroys "your" (WTF!?) opponent's monster with an "Attack" higher than the original "Attack"...The "" mark the problems XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted March 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 I think it should say "By" the effect of "The book of life" XDAnd' date=' you but attack, not ATK twice >_>[/quote'] nope sorry, lol, you see to bring it back from the graveyard, it has to be 'with' something, but if it was a monster bringing it back, then it would be by, becuase it implies that the monster is doing something, lol, you see, japanese people know english, and the problem still hasnt been found, lol, keep trying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 I edited my post >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted March 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 I think it should say "By" the effect of "The book of life" XDAnd' date=' you but attack, not ATK twice >_>The sentance is just plain wrong, whe this card desroys "your" (WTF!?) opponent's monster with an "Attack" higher than the original "Attack"...The "" mark the problems XD[/quote'] lol omg wow, you got it, and for your information, lol you use ATK when talking about increasing or decreasing the amount. but im changin it right now lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 yay, where is my cookie or prize? >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faded Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 I would remove the part about it having to destroy a monster with higher ATK than the original ATK of that card. Its already about as hard as it is to summon already. Dont want that hard work to go down the drain just because it couldnt get its last effect off... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted March 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 I would remove the part about it having to destroy a monster with higher ATK than the original ATK of that card. Its already about as hard as it is to summon already. Dont want that hard work to go down the drain just because it couldnt get its last effect off... what? no no nololit says that this card cannot be Special Summoned except by the effect of book of life, it can still be tribute summoned >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Diviner Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Cool card dude.Remember me ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted March 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Cool card dude.Remember me ? lol of course i remember you my little rahim friend, lets see, the last i was here, you were 20-8+2-4+2+6-2-4 lol, and you were thinking about quiting, thats when you cahnged your name to mychemicalrahim, because your fav. band is my chemical romance ^^_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faded Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 what? no no nololit says that this card cannot be Special Summoned except by the effect of book of life, it can still be tribute summoned >_> <_< Back atcha lol oh yeah I forgot about it being summoned the normal way. I take but what I said. Its nicely balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted March 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 what? no no nololit says that this card cannot be Special Summoned except by the effect of book of life' date=' it can still be tribute summoned >_>[/quote'] <_< Back atcha lol oh yeah I forgot about it being summoned the normal way. I take but what I said. Its nicely balanced. lol thanks, btw, thanks for the rep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kid Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 cool card bloodrun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 i dislike the pic, but the card was awesome. wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted March 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 i dislike the pic' date=' but the card was awesome. wow.[/quote'] you really didnt like the picture? wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Im with CD i dont like the image, its just, i dont know, its not striking me as Wow. But the effect is Uber awsome ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted March 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Im with CD i dont like the image' date=' its just, i dont know, its not striking me as Wow. But the effect is Uber awsome ^_^[/quote'] well darn oh well, but thank you, i like the effect to ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Of course you do lol You made it lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 well the quality well blurry a bit mate and i just dont like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faded Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Im with CD i dont like the image' date=' its just, i dont know, its not striking me as Wow. But the effect is Uber awsome ^_^[/quote'] I wouldnt say anything about a cards picture if I was yous. It may not be the best but not every card is going to have nice pictures, and Ive seen worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted March 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Im with CD i dont like the image' date=' its just, i dont know, its not striking me as Wow. But the effect is Uber awsome ^_^[/quote'] I wouldnt say anything about a cards picture if I was yous. It may not be the best but not every card is going to have nice pictures, and Ive seen worse. lol i have as well, but all the same, a pics a pic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.