Jump to content

most of my new "Black Elementals"


Code Y.C.M

Recommended Posts

HERE ARE SOME OF MY NEW "BLACK ELEMENTALS"

49.jpg

mm.jpg

50.jpg

i have moved a lot of cards to this post instead of having them on other posts okay hope you enjoy them plz rate

\/ "Destroyers" \/

fffdd.jpg

ffda.jpg

mm-1.jpg

\/ "support" \/

15-1.jpg

16.jpg

[Edit]

\/ "Wraith Breeder" \/

which one is better"

untitled-2.jpg or 14-1.jpg

13-2.jpg12-3.jpg10-8.jpg8-7.jpg5-8.jpg

HIGHER LEVEL:

3-8.jpg2-8.jpg1-10.jpg4-7.jpg9-9.jpg11-3.jpg6-5.jpg

HIGHEST LEVEL:

7-3.jpg

RAREST:

ULTRA:

None

SECRET RARE:

knight1.jpggaurddfd.jpg

ULTIMATE RARE:

lich-1.jpg

SOON TO BE SECRET RARE:

50.jpgfffdd.jpgffda.jpgmm-1.jpg49.jpg

SOON TO BE UTLRA RARE:

16.jpg11-3.jpg6-5.jpg9-8.jpg(I KNOW < IS ALSO ULTIMATE BUT IT IS ALSO ULTRA)

 

ONE OF THE TYPE OF CARDS I AM MAKING CALLED "HISTORY" (eg: Chimera (??? + ???) / History / Effect, and it has spell cards that support it really well [this is the card \/ ] [Note: i have not finished and i wanna ask bobscholtz (???) how to do it better] )

aurad-1.jpg

THIS IS THE FINISHED VERSION OF ONE I HOPE YOU LIKE IT COZ I GOT A HEADACHE FROM DOING IT LOL

ProjectX.jpg

i hope u like it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how r these cards Realistic cards there not there r no card with fiend fariy or fiend machine these r not realistic rate is 4/10

 

^Well, my Rotator cards are not technically "realistic" because the "Rotator" type doesn't exist in the real TCG, but I still consider them to be realistic because they could successfully be used in the real TCG. So, these could be realistic also, since the real TCG could have "Chimera" type monsters.^

 

 

Anyway, about the actual cards, the pics are okay, but the OCG needs some work. Good start though.

 

overall - 10.00/13.69 ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok a couple of things

the picutres are awesome

but

when you write Life Points, its not written like this: Life-Points, its just Life Points

when your writing an attirbute, it is weritten like WIND, and thats it, well, WIND Attribute, no Wind-Attirbute, k?

and when your write about increasing or decreasing attacks and defenses, they are written like ATK, and DEF, but when your talking like:

this mopnster can attack, such and such

its written Attack, k?

rating

9/10

nice job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...