Zextra Posted September 19, 2012 Report Share Posted September 19, 2012 [center]I've been out of the game for a month or two so I apologize if my sense of everything is off [/center] [center]As of what I was thinking when I made this, I really don't know for sure; I might have been imagining Snowman Eater, but that's all I'm able to make out... Also, on another note, the picture seemed nice, so I just wanted to make something out of it...[/center] [center][img]http://i47.tinypic.com/30xfjfs.png[/img][/center] [center]Effect:[/center] [center]2 Level 6 monsters[/center] [center]If a DARK monster is used as an Xyz Material for the Xyz Summon of this card: This card cannot be destroyed by card effects. Once per turn, during either player’s turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card; negate the effect of a card that was Set. When this card destroys a non-LIGHT monster by battle: banish the destroyed monster.[/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garthfunkle Vii Backwards Posted September 19, 2012 Report Share Posted September 19, 2012 quick question needs to be answer before one can say the effect is OP'ed or not ? does have to be only 1 DARK Xyz Material or they have to be both ? one way to go is while this card has 1 or xyz material that is a DARK monster attached to it; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richie123 Posted September 19, 2012 Report Share Posted September 19, 2012 Very nice card! Doesn't look too OP'd and not too weak either! Like the artwork, the effect is interesting, I'l give 9/10! One question though: Is 2700 ATK too high for a rank 6 Xyz? Just wondering cuz' you wouldn't find that ATK on any level 6 monster. Overall, great job! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted September 20, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2012 [quote name='Garthfunkle Vii Backwards' timestamp='1348089774' post='6028193'] quick question needs to be answer before one can say the effect is OP'ed or not ? does have to be only 1 DARK Xyz Material or they have to be both ? one way to go is while this card has 1 or xyz material that is a DARK monster attached to it; [/quote] Yes, it only requires 1 DARK for that effect to activate. Still, aside from maybe Caius, there aren't that many Level 6 DARKS that are used often. [quote name='richie123' timestamp='1348094454' post='6028228'] Very nice card! Doesn't look too OP'd and not too weak either! Like the artwork, the effect is interesting, I'l give 9/10! One question though: Is 2700 ATK too high for a rank 6 Xyz? Just wondering cuz' you wouldn't find that ATK on any level 6 monster. Overall, great job! [/quote] 2700 is pretty average for a Rank 6 - Photon Strike Bounzer has 2700, Fullmetal Photoglide has 2800, Sword Breaker has 2700, Ptolymes has 2700, Atlandis has 2600, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted September 20, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2012 My singles are pretty unpopular, I take it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Tigerwolf Posted September 20, 2012 Report Share Posted September 20, 2012 [quote name='Zextra' timestamp='1348089291' post='6028186'] [center][img]http://oi45.tinypic.com/24fmyad.jpg[/img][/center] [center]Effect:[/center] [center]2 Level 6 monsters[/center] [center]If a DARK monster is used as an Xyz Material for the Xyz Summon of this card: This card cannot be destroyed by card effects. Once per turn, during either player’s turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card; [b]negate the activation and effect of a Set card[/b]. When this card destroys a non-LIGHT monster by battle: banish the destroyed monster.[/center] [/quote] Do note: When a card is activated it is no longer set. You may want to re-write that bolded part of the effect. Generic Rank 6 with plausible effect protection. Now I can easily Dark Hole, Torrential Tribute safely. 2 Level 6 monsters make this card smexy to summon, and the anti-LIGHT monster clause is actually quite nice. Too bad it can't run over BLS...oh wells. Least it gets rid of Pulsar Dragon so I don't have to worry about it and as Generics go, this is a nice side/main since I can go into it instead of bounzer for similar results depending on what I'm playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted September 20, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2012 [quote name='Chance Furlong' timestamp='1348162514' post='6028765'] Do note: When a card is activated it is no longer set. You may want to re-write that bolded part of the effect. Generic Rank 6 with plausible effect protection. Now I can easily Dark Hole, Torrential Tribute safely. 2 Level 6 monsters make this card smexy to summon, and the anti-LIGHT monster clause is actually quite nice. Too bad it can't run over BLS...oh wells. Least it gets rid of Pulsar Dragon so I don't have to worry about it and as Generics go, this is a nice side/main since I can go into it instead of bounzer for similar results depending on what I'm playing. [/quote] Right...that makes sense; I can't believe i would have missed something like that :/ Anyway, regarding that effect, could it be rewritten as: "negate the activation and effect of a card that was Set"? As for your feedback, I appreciate it - my aim was to make a Rank 6 whose usability is comparable to Bounzer, since arguably, Bounzer is probably the most-used Rank 6 (aside from maybe Atum, of course). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Tigerwolf Posted September 20, 2012 Report Share Posted September 20, 2012 [quote name='Zextra' timestamp='1348163115' post='6028772'] Right...that makes sense; I can't believe i would have missed something like that :/ Anyway, regarding that effect, could it be rewritten as: "negate the activation and effect of a card that was Set"? [/quote] Preferably "negate" in a stun form should be better since getting rid of the card would make the card broken. [color=#000000]"Once per turn, during either player’s turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card;[/color] [color=#000000]negate the activation and effect of a card (and set it).?[/color] That may be better. [quote name='Zextra' timestamp='1348163115' post='6028772'] As for your feedback, I appreciate it - my aim was to make a Rank 6 whose usability is comparable to Bounzer, since arguably, Bounzer is probably the most-used Rank 6 (aside from maybe Atum, of course). [/quote] It's not fair to compare Atum for Dragon.deks to Bounzer (generic Decks). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted September 20, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2012 [quote name='Chance Furlong' timestamp='1348163739' post='6028780'] Preferably "negate" in a stun form should be better since getting rid of the card would make the card broken. [color=#000000]"Once per turn, during either player’s turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card;[/color] [color=#000000]negate the activation and effect of a card (and set it).?[/color] That may be better. [/quote] But that would cut the usability of it to only Traps and Spells, since a Monster effect that activates upon being flipped (Ryko, Morphing Jar, Snowman Eater, Penguin Soldier) would simply activate again if re-Set. [quote name='Chance Furlong' timestamp='1348163739' post='6028780'] It's not fair to compare Atum for Dragon.deks to Bounzer (generic Decks). [/quote] Exactly my point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Tigerwolf Posted September 20, 2012 Report Share Posted September 20, 2012 [quote name='Zextra' timestamp='1348164542' post='6028788'] But that would cut the usability of it to only Traps and Spells, since a Monster effect that activates upon being flipped (Ryko, Morphing Jar, Snowman Eater, Penguin Soldier) would simply activate again if re-Set. [/quote] True...maybe returning said negated card to the deck would be better as it "removes" said problem card, but it has the potential to come again in later game play. Kind of like Ehren does with Lightsworns/as a tech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted September 20, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2012 For now I'll just leave it the way it is (with the reworded effect) until I come up with a better, more well-constructed effect that ties in both aspects together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted September 21, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 21, 2012 Meow :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted September 22, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2012 Bump? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted September 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2012 Bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted September 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2012 Bump... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted September 24, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2012 Bump...again :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted September 25, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2012 And yet another bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted September 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2012 Bump? :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted September 26, 2012 Report Share Posted September 26, 2012 It seems pretty balanced. But what I'd like to know is if its effect activates when said DARK monster is attached as Xyz material or if it was used in the first place. Anyways, onto the card. It seems to be a good defender for a deck, and its definitely worth the 2 monsters to bring it out. I can see this being used in twilight decks, as it only needs 1 DARK material. Good card, 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.