harkensaw Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stikstik001 Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 I see some OCG errors like special summoned should be capitalized: Special Summon. and there are minor grammer errors as well like no space after a period. its a very nice set ignoring those minor ocg and grammer issues, there... alright 8.9/10, thats in the upper A- catagory ^_^ lol. PS: instead of: "Arlock(Awakend)" try putting Arlock - Awakend. PSS: dont make up attributes like "Angel" use Fairy, because they fit in that catagory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester_of_Emotion Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 I asume you mean their fairies instead of angels. Sorry, but for some reason, the american versions of the angel cards were changed to fairies *rolls eyes* Anyway, something bothers me about Arlock Awakened, so, in order ot tribute summon it, you just need to sacrifice one powerful level four monster. If that's the case' it's very overpowered, since it can be returned to the hand and simply special summoned straight away. Arlock the Angelic Warrior seems a little too powerful as well. Normally level 4 monsters with 2000 attack or more have a drawback, but this card allows you to special summon more monsters, so you could easily bring out three of these guys in one turn. Yarymi doesn't bother me so much. It's just the last part that confuses me. What does it do as a spell card? Is it like hte Crystal Beasts and just sits there? I truly don't see any real point in that last bit, but otherwse, it's acceptable. The Arlocks:not bad pictures, but their effects seem a little overpowered. For the angelic warrior, you could lower its attack a bit, and for awakened, either remove the return to your hand effect, lower its attack or both. 6/10 Yarymi:Once again, not a bad picture. A perfectly acceptable card if it didn't have that spell effect. It just doesn't make sense. 7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkensaw Posted March 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 dude the drawback is 0 def Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stikstik001 Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 dude the drawback is 0 def no i get where he is coming from' date=' even tho his attack is 0, you dont have to put him in defence position, and he can be used as a constant life point gaurd which is definatly overpowered. and if that card is played on the first turn, your opponent is automatically done for. make it so that conditions must be meet to summon him. also, Arlock - Awakened is still wrong, i just relised that Awakened is spelled wrong. Arlock[space']-[space]Awakened Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkensaw Posted March 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 have you ever heard of gene warped warwolf from STON i have that card in real life its 2000/100 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkensaw Posted March 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 no offense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stikstik001 Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 have you ever heard of gene warped warwolf from STON i have that card in real life its 2000/100 but what is its effect? thats the thing... (no offense taken.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkensaw Posted March 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 see for your self Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stikstik001 Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 see for your self The effect of Arlock makes it too powerful. the card that you showed me has no effect, so... its preatty balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkensaw Posted March 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 good point hey were cool right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Hopz Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 they are ok. make em more balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkensaw Posted March 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 hows this i lowered the ATK by 200 thats a lot because its a 4 star lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Lots of spelling errors, and OCG needs improvement... 4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stikstik001 Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 hows this i lowered the ATK by 200 thats a lot because its a 4 star lol giving that cad a decrease in ATK was a good move, that makes it easier to destroy so the effect wont be used as much, so its not AS overpowered. but its acceptable ^_^. on that new card you put up... first this thats wrong... is the color of the card... dont do that espcially when the card isnt a special type in any way. and its overpowered, increase its stars to 6 or 5, 7 at the most. but not 4. other than that and some OCG errors, the new card is preatty good. and yeah, we're cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOUL Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 Good pics, some Errors. Maybe 9/10 would do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ruby Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 I like fallen angel knight, pics are great...8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.