L0SS Posted March 6, 2013 Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 2 or more (max. 4) Level 4 Monsters Once per turn: You can detach 1 Xyz material from this card to banish 1 card in your opponent's graveyard. This card gains effects based on the number of Xyz Materials attached to it. • 2 or more: This card gains 100 ATK and DEF for each Xyz Material attached to it. • 3 or more: This card can attack twice during the same Battle Phase • 4: This card can attack directly. [hr] May be OP'd, I don't know. I thought it was a nice way to set up what is practically a rank 4 beat-stick with a way of giving its self a push. It isn't going to gain a huge amount of ATK, but getting 4 level 4's on the field is basically a cinch nowadays. The ability to attack twice and directly means it might be able to pull off a OTK with some support, if played right. ~Feedback appreciated! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synchronized Posted March 6, 2013 Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 I don't think it's really that broken, or at least I wouldn't if Wind-Ups weren't a thing. The problem is with 4 materials, it can attack directly for 4400 and OTK in two turns. With Wind-Ups' ability to churn out Xyz Material like nobody's business, i imagine it wouldn't be all that difficult to swing for game with 1 or 2 of these. Now I'm not sure how consistently they can do it anymore, but that's really the only Deck that has me on the fence about this. I guess in that respect though, the problem would be with Magician and not this card itself, so it seems pretty good as is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L0SS Posted March 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 I don't think it's really that broken, or at least I wouldn't if Wind-Ups weren't a thing. The problem is with 4 materials, it can attack directly for 4400 and OTK in two turns. With Wind-Ups' ability to churn out Xyz Material like nobody's business, i imagine it wouldn't be all that difficult to swing for game with 1 or 2 of these. Now I'm not sure how consistently they can do it anymore, but that's really the only Deck that has me on the fence about this. I guess in that respect though, the problem would be with Magician and not this card itself, so it seems pretty good as is. You're right, Wind-Ups sought of make this problematic. On the other hand, it's pretty susceptible to a well timed Solemn/Torrential/anything else; so it isn't hard to get rid of if you really want to. If you take the card objectively on it's own (which it isn't really fair to do, but hey), I think it's in the right position. Thanks for the input. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleaknight Posted March 6, 2013 Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 Broken with Hunders / Offering Gadgets. They can make Rank 4s like it's nothing (to Offering Gadgets it's close to literally nothing - they could OTK with this.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L0SS Posted March 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2013 Broken with Hunders / Offering Gadgets. They can make Rank 4s like it's nothing (to Offering Gadgets it's close to literally nothing - they could OTK with this.) Did not think of that. Do you think it would be advisable to change it to rank 5/6? The only issue is I don't want it going completely the other way. Rank 6 might be the best compromise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleaknight Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 The card artwork kind of resembles Monarchs to me... so it'd be fitting as a Rank 6, yet the card itself would need to be overhauled as getting more than 3 Level 6 monsters on the field simultaneously is not an easy task, except maybe in Hieratics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L0SS Posted March 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 The card artwork kind of resembles Monarchs to me... so it'd be fitting as a Rank 6, yet the card itself would need to be overhauled as getting more than 3 Level 6 monsters on the field simultaneously is not an easy task, except maybe in Hieratics. I like that idea. Monarch style might be interesting. I'll play around with that concept. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.