Veniet Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 Well then, here is the newest set I've been working on. I intend these to work with most Warrior-based decks, as well as focus on a singular new card in this set. Here they are. (Forgive me if my spoilers are messy) [spoiler='Effect']This card is not affected by the effects of Field Spell cards. The DEF of this card is increased by 100x the number of face-up Warrior-type monsters on your field. If "Teq" is face-up on your field, this card cannot be selected as an attack target.[/spoiler] [spoiler='Effect']When this card battles with a DARK monster: Destroy that monster after damage calculation. If "Tsana of Eni" is face-up on your field, this card cannot be destroyed by battle.[/spoiler] [spoiler='Effect']When this card attacks a face-up Warrior-type monster: Increase this card's ATK by 500 until the end of the Battle Phase of the turn this card battles. When "Tsana of Eni" is Normal Summoned while this card is face-up on your field: Target 1 active Field spell card; Destroy it.[/spoiler] [spoiler='Effect'] FLIP- Special Summon "Teq" from your deck face-up in DEF. When this card is tributed for the Tribute Summon of "Tsana of Eni": Special Summon 1 lvl 4 or lower Warrior-type monster from your Graveyard (except "Reddy" and "Teq")[/spoiler] [spoiler='Effect'] If there is a non-Warrior type monster face-up on your field, destroy this face-up card. When this card is targeted by a card effect: You can tribute this card face-up: Target 1 Spell/Trap card from your deck; Add it to your hand.[/spoiler] And the following cards are my couple Spells. [spoiler='Effect']Once per turn while "Tsana of Eni" is in your graveyard: You can return 1 face-up Warrior-type monster on your field to the deck; Add 1 lvl 4 or lower Warrior-type monster from your deck to your hand. You cannot attack directly the turn you use this effect.[/spoiler] [spoiler='Effect']Activate only when "Teq" is attacked while you control "Tsana of Eni" face-up next to "Teq". Increase its ATK and DEF by half of "Tsana of Eni"'s ATK and DEF.[/spoiler] Look forward to hearing new ideas and suggestions; Thank you again for your time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veniet Posted March 9, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 9, 2013 Bumpity bump! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JacobGoch Posted March 9, 2013 Report Share Posted March 9, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veniet Posted March 9, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 9, 2013 Wait, what do you mean by posting these, and are these existing cards in the game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swag swag swag swag swag s Posted March 9, 2013 Report Share Posted March 9, 2013 Terraforming > Field Spell > Field Spell eff > Summon the 6900 thing > Free 6900 beater. Seems legit. Also, why are you posting these here? You're not supposed to post your cards here. Make your own topic and do it, though it will probably be locked. But whatever... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veniet Posted March 9, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 9, 2013 First of all, this is off-topic. Second of all, no Normal Monsters can not surpass the Blue Eyes in Atk. I refuse to elaborate further simply because I don't want this topic locked, and if you want your cards reviewed, post in your own, new topic, please. This is considered impolite and unrelated to the topic at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeimuzu Akage Posted March 9, 2013 Report Share Posted March 9, 2013 Agreed. Jacob, if you'd like to post your cards for review, you have to make your own topic. Otherwise, you should probably delete your post before a mod shows up. Until then, we should probably stick to just discussing Veniet's cards, lest this thread get locked. Regarding the actual topic, I think that there may be some balance issues with a few of the cards; The Swan Knight; Not really OP'd, but I still feel like it needs to be mentioned. If Tsana of Eni is already invulnerable to field spell cards, why use an effect that lets you destroy a field spell? It's not even like the card gives you an option to choose whether or not to destroy the spell. What if you have your own field spell active? Jiu-Ku: A little abusable, me thinks. You might want to make it so that it's effect only activates when it's targeted by an opponent's card effect. Otherwise, you could just target it with one of your own effects and get a spell of your choice. And that could potentially win you the game. Twin-Love Counter: In my mind, this is the only 100% OP'd card. Not only can you get another monster with above 3000 ATK for virtually no cost, but it also destroys all DARK monsters and can't be destroyed by battle. It doesn't help that Teq, being a level 4, is quite searchable and easy to summon. There are also some OCG issues, though I don't have the time to touch on them right now. Aside from that, I think that these cards are quite interesting and definitely have potential. I'm sorry that I may not have included as much detail as I would have liked; I'm running short on time right now. If you'd like me to, I can help you out with the OCG stuff a little later. However, I'd like to point out that I'm not the most experienced person on this website, so you should probably get a second opinion before you go and change anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veniet Posted March 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2013 Agreed. Jacob, if you'd like to post your cards for review, you have to make your own topic. Otherwise, you should probably delete your post before a mod shows up. Until then, we should probably stick to just discussing Veniet's cards, lest this thread get locked. Regarding the actual topic, I think that there may be some balance issues with a few of the cards; The Swan Knight; Not really OP'd, but I still feel like it needs to be mentioned. If Tsana of Eni is already invulnerable to field spell cards, why use an effect that lets you destroy a field spell? It's not even like the card gives you an option to choose whether or not to destroy the spell. What if you have your own field spell active? Jiu-Ku: A little abusable, me thinks. You might want to make it so that it's effect only activates when it's targeted by an opponent's card effect. Otherwise, you could just target it with one of your own effects and get a spell of your choice. And that could potentially win you the game. Twin-Love Counter: In my mind, this is the only 100% OP'd card. Not only can you get another monster with above 3000 ATK for virtually no cost, but it also destroys all DARK monsters and can't be destroyed by battle. It doesn't help that Teq, being a level 4, is quite searchable and easy to summon. There are also some OCG issues, though I don't have the time to touch on them right now. Aside from that, I think that these cards are quite interesting and definitely have potential. I'm sorry that I may not have included as much detail as I would have liked; I'm running short on time right now. If you'd like me to, I can help you out with the OCG stuff a little later. However, I'd like to point out that I'm not the most experienced person on this website, so you should probably get a second opinion before you go and change anything. Sure, at your convenience, I'd love you hear your OCG fixes; I'll refrain from changing anything just yet until you have time or someone offers OCG corrections. About "Swan": I intend to keep her as is, but I will add that she'll only target the opponent's fields. Other than this effect, I thought it was balanced with having a +500 gain against other Warriors, and her second effect almost pointless unless the opponent uses another annoying Field spell. It only activates when "Tsana" is Normal Summoned with Swan already on the field. About "Jiu-Ku": Thanks for the suggestion; Sure, I'll definately tone its effect down to the player won't be able to get its effect off with their own cards. That balances her out I think. I won't change anything just yet though. I like awaiting other's input a little before moving on. About "Twin-Love": I guess I'll agree with it beign OP; I'd like to word it in a way to where "Teq" won't exceed 3000 Atk, and do you think limiting this card to once a duel and to 1 per deck would balance it even after the above fix? Thank you again for your time, Jeimuzu. Peace until next time! (no pun intended; I don't intend on giving anyone chaos :P) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeimuzu Akage Posted March 10, 2013 Report Share Posted March 10, 2013 No problem : ) Yeah, "Swan" is perfectly fine in terms of power. Sorry if I implied otherwise ^^" I just felt like that one effect wasn't particularly useful, at least when compared to the plethora of other possible effects. But I digress. I'm still not 100% sure about "Twin-Love"...I'm not trying to be annoying or anything, but I still kinda think it's a tad OP, even with those changes. However, I'm really just nit-picking with this matter, so I promise this is the last you'll hear of it from me unless someone else has an idea for it's improvement. Alrighty, so here comes the fun part: Grammar >:3 [spoiler='Tsana of Eni']This card is not affected by the effects of Field Spell cards. The DEF of this card is increased by 100 times the number of face-up Warrior-type monsters on your side of the field. If you control a face-up "Teq" monster, this card cannot be selected as an attack target.[/spoiler] [spoiler='TEQ']If this card battles a DARK monster: destroy that monster after damage calculation. If you control a face-up "Tsana of Eni" monster, this card cannot be destroyed by battle.[/spoiler] [spoiler='The Swan Knight']When this card attacks a face-up Warrior-type monster, increase this card's ATK by 500 until the end of the Battle Phase. If "Tsana of Eni" is Normal Summoned while this card is face-up on your side of the field: Target 1 active Field spell card; Destroy it.[/spoiler] [spoiler='Reddy']FLIP: Special Summon 1 "Teq" from your deck in face-up in DEF. When this card is Tributed for the Tribute Summon of "Tsana of Eni": Special Summon 1 level 4 or lower Warrior-type monster from your Graveyard (except "Reddy" or "Teq")[/spoiler] [spoiler='Jiu-Ku']If you control a face-up, non-Warrior-type monster; destroy this card. When this card is targeted by an opponent's card effect: You can tribute this face-up card: Target 1 Spell/Trap card from your deck, and add it to your hand.[/spoiler] [spoiler='Forward!']Once per turn, while "Tsana of Eni" is in your graveyard: You can return 1 face-up Warrior-type monster you control to the deck. Then, Add 1 level 4 or lower Warrior-type monster from your deck to your hand. You cannot attack directly the turn you use this effect.[/spoiler] [spoiler='Twin Love Counter']Activate only when "Teq" is selected as an attack target while you control a face-up "Tsana of Eni" that is adjacent to the attack target. Increase its ATK and DEF by half of the "Tsana of Eni"'s ATK and DEF.[/spoiler] Please, feel free to question and discuss my edits. As much as it pains me to admit it, I have made mistakes before, and there's nothing to prevent me from having done so again :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veniet Posted March 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2013 Hmm, I'll agree with most of your OCG corrections, Jeimazu, but I'd like to mention something I thought changed in recent Official Grammar. I had heard terms that reffered to "your side of the field" were officially deemed incorrect and changed to "to your field", when specifying which player's field was being referred to. I may be wrong, but I'd like to have this clarified by multiple parties before I commit to changing that line ^^. Once again, I thank you for your input, Jeimazu, and will begin working on some of those fixes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veniet Posted March 15, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2013 Bumping< I do realize there is a European "Swan Knight", but there is also an eastern, far older historical "Swan Knight" that's a woman. Hehe (Art belongs to Royo) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.