Another anti-Xyz?

[Veniet]

  Hy guys! This isn't exactly a new idea, but I think I made it unique enough (hopefully). Lets let you meet this lady! (I am aware most my cards are female; Borderline feminist)

 

 

 [spoiler='Effect']Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set. Can only be Special Summoned (from your hand) while you control no cards on the field. Once per turn: You can banish 1 face-up Warrior-type monster from your field to give it the following Effect:
* If an opponent's card effect activates in response to this card (through battle or targeted) this turn: Negate the activation; All face-up Xyz monsters lose 500 ATK and DEF and cannot detach materials until the End Phase of your opponent's next turn.[/spoiler]

 

 As usual, comments/OCG fixes appreciated!

[Zazubat]

Please explain what you mean by this: "If this card triggers an opponent's card effect this turn;"? Because I'm unsure how it would trigger any card effect, or what you really mean by this. It's Summoning requirements are okay, at first I was sceptical, but then I remembered that Gorz excists, so it's okay, though I would make it a Level 7 or 8 instead as 2500 and above fits those more than a Level 6 does. I would suggest you fix up your OCG a bit. Add this in instead: "Must be Special Summoned by controlling no cards and cannot be Special Summoned by other ways."

I'll review it further later.

[Veniet]

Please explain what you mean by this: "If this card triggers an opponent's card effect this turn;"? Because I'm unsure how it would trigger any card effect, or what you really mean by this. It's Summoning requirements are okay, at first I was sceptical, but then I remembered that Gorz excists, so it's okay, though I would make it a Level 7 or 8 instead as 2500 and above fits those more than a Level 6 does. I would suggest you fix up your OCG a bit. Add this in instead: "Must be Special Summoned by controlling no cards and cannot be Special Summoned by other ways."

I'll review it further later.

 

  What I meant by that quote was, if the opponent reacts to the card in any way the turn a Warrior was banished, to initially get off Shangshan's effect of decreasing Xyz's Atk and unable to detach materials. I worded it really wrong, truly. I fixed it a bit and no longer states "If this card triggers". Now it says it can negate a card effect if a Warrior was banished earlier that turn.

 Hope this helps it more understandable.

[Zazubat]

It's still an extreamly confusing effect to me, but I understand it a little bit better. Though it's useless. All it does for you is that you banish your own monster, your opponent can simply choose not to do anything, and you -1. If you had a reason to banish the monster for some sort of effect that might effect your opponent (say destroy one of their cards or something like that) then your opponent would have a reason to actually activate a card. But right now, it's only use is that it's a nice beatstick.

[Veniet]

  That's my entire intention, Zazi, as disapointing as it may seem. Its entire purpose is a continuos minus one to the player, until it gets to a point they need to respond to it, and then can be an interesting dance. But its still easily taken care of in battle.

[Zazubat]

  That's my entire intention, Zazi, as disapointing as it may seem. Its entire purpose is a continuos minus one to the player, until it gets to a point they need to respond to it, and then can be an interesting dance. But its still easily taken care of in battle.

Oh I get it now, it makes it so if your opponent doesn't activate Mirror Force, they will lose their ability to detach and it will decrease. Could be useful, though that also means you might end up losing your monster. I don't think it's extreamly useful, and is pretty situational.

[Veniet]

Oh I get it now, it makes it so if your opponent doesn't activate Mirror Force, they will lose their ability to detach and it will decrease. Could be useful, though that also means you might end up losing your monster. I don't think it's extreamly useful, and is pretty situational.

 

  Yep yep; I particularly enjoy forcing my opponent to deal with a beater like this until they try interacting with my card to be negated at least once. I didn't give her high Atk to make it even and able to lose out to some Xyz' in battle. Overall I thought this idea was nice.

 Thanks, Zazi!