Spellcaster - Elf Archtype

[pdal6942]

So my favourite card is the Mystical Elf adn the Dark Elf.

 

I thought today, i wish there was more support for these types of cards.

 

So i decided to start on this.

 

Turning the few spellcaster elfs there are; Gemini Elf, Aincient Elf, Dark Elf, and Mystical Elf. theres an xyz monster to but he dosent fit well.

 

 

Please correct my OCG, if any one lieks the idea, let me know and ill continue on this.

 

 

[pdal6942]

Bump

[Avaren]

1st... I think this is the wrong spot for this... isn't this the single cards not sets?

 

 

2nd... going to hide behind my post count so I can OCG fix without reviewing...

 

"Spellcaster" type is incorrect, Spellcaster-Type is more along the correct lines

 

and I'm sure you could use ""Elf" monster", rather then "monster with "Elf" in it's name".

 

there is a thread with OCG stuff around here somewhere, try a search.

 

 

*Gets back behind low-post-count shield* "Don't shot me mods"

[L0SS]

*Runs through crossfire* *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* *Dodges bullets* *CLACK-CLACK-CLACK* *Takes bullet for Avaren*

As Avaren said, should be in Sets. The OCG could be simplified considerably. One sentence that really bugs me is "Even if it is face-down, but reveal it to your opponent in that case" I don't think that has ever been proper OCG. It's a tricky one, but I'd word it like this:

"When an 'Elf' monster you control is targeted for an attack (if it is face-down, reveal it to your opponent): Negate the attack and End the Battle Phase."

The cards themselves look pretty competent. Fairly balanced, although hardly revolutionary. That said, maybe with more cards, you will build a bigger concept for them.

[pdal6942]

1st... I think this is the wrong spot for this... isn't this the single cards not sets?

 

 

2nd... going to hide behind my post count so I can OCG fix without reviewing...

 

"Spellcaster" type is incorrect, Spellcaster-Type is more along the correct lines

 

and I'm sure you could use ""Elf" monster", rather then "monster with "Elf" in it's name".

 

there is a thread with OCG stuff around here somewhere, try a search.

 

 

*Gets back behind low-post-count shield* "Don't shot me mods"

Hey thanks for the tips, ill definetly make the aporpriate changes. I try my best to use actual cards to find examples of similar text, im pretty new to this so i really aprecaite the ocg corrections helps me more then you know.

 

*Runs through crossfire* *BANG* *BANG* *BANG* *Dodges bullets* *CLACK-CLACK-CLACK* *Takes bullet for Avaren*

As Avaren said, should be in Sets. The OCG could be simplified considerably. One sentence that really bugs me is "Even if it is face-down, but reveal it to your opponent in that case" I don't think that has ever been proper OCG. It's a tricky one, but I'd word it like this:

"When an 'Elf' monster you control is targeted for an attack (if it is face-down, reveal it to your opponent): Negate the attack and the Battle Phase."

The cards themselves look pretty competent. Fairly balanced, although hardly revolutionary. That said, maybe with more cards, you will build a bigger concept for them.

Thanks to you as well. I actually got the wording Even if it is face-down, but reveal it to your opponent in that case, from clay charge,  i should add im referancing card descriptions as there written on DN im wondering now if maybe there not correct OCG, ill do a little research and polish up these cards.

 

 

As for this being the wrong post...... I know , please someone tell me how to move the topic if thats even possible. This started as a single card, the etheral elf, and i just got so many more ideas.