Jump to content

Spellmaster of the North (Because I haven't made a card in forever ._.)


Yosuke-kun

Recommended Posts

[URL=http://s1261.photobucket.com/user/BloodreaverX/media/Other%20Cards/SpellmasteroftheNorth_zpsb53288d6.jpg.html]SpellmasteroftheNorth_zpsb53288d6.jpg[/URL]

 

[spoiler=Lore]

When this card enters your hand from your Deck, Graveyard, or Banished Zone: Special Summon it. If this card would be destroyed by battle: Return it to your hand after damage calculation. While you control another Spellcaster: Your opponent can't Banish cards.

[/spoiler]

 

Yup. Decided to post this. No real reason. Just got bored, thought "Hey a reoccurring Spellcaster card would be kinda cool." so I made him. TCG probably needs to be fixed though. Anyways, thoughts, feedback, criticisms?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For some reason I read that ROTL as Return Of The Legend....

 

As it is written now, this card SS off of being drawn (even during DP). That is quite powerful thing, so if it is intentional, then IMO you should add a limit/condition to it SS. If it is not, the effect can still be triggered by Ptolemy M7, Star Hall, Dark Eruption, Sangan, Creeping Darkness, Monster Reincarnation.... I think that's it. Still that's good enough. It does not make it splashable nor spammable, but it's sure playable, turnning the cards above into "Monster Reborn"s is just enough. Also, a walking Iron Wall that escapes destruction (well, battle destruction) can be annoying.

 

Suggestions:

Well, only one. Make both its SS and returning effects optional by adding "You can" before actions. It could be a typo, or you might be using it as drawback or to make sure it does not miss time, which I understand for the first effect but not the second. All the cards I listed above need this to be in grave or deck, so forcing it back into hand does not help (Again, I assume its unintentional).

 

Hope I helped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does help thanks. I was actually trying to decide on whether I should make it optional or not with the second effect, but decide to go with not so that you can't just kill it off then use use Monster Reincarnation or something to SS it again, but making the first effect optional would probably balance it out a little more.

 

Again, thanks for the feedback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...