Yosuke-kun Posted August 1, 2013 Report Share Posted August 1, 2013 [URL=http://s1261.photobucket.com/user/BloodreaverX/media/Other%20Cards/SpellmasteroftheNorth_zpsb53288d6.jpg.html][/URL] [spoiler=Lore] When this card enters your hand from your Deck, Graveyard, or Banished Zone: Special Summon it. If this card would be destroyed by battle: Return it to your hand after damage calculation. While you control another Spellcaster: Your opponent can't Banish cards. [/spoiler] Yup. Decided to post this. No real reason. Just got bored, thought "Hey a reoccurring Spellcaster card would be kinda cool." so I made him. TCG probably needs to be fixed though. Anyways, thoughts, feedback, criticisms? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shin~ Posted August 1, 2013 Report Share Posted August 1, 2013 For some reason I read that ROTL as Return Of The Legend.... As it is written now, this card SS off of being drawn (even during DP). That is quite powerful thing, so if it is intentional, then IMO you should add a limit/condition to it SS. If it is not, the effect can still be triggered by Ptolemy M7, Star Hall, Dark Eruption, Sangan, Creeping Darkness, Monster Reincarnation.... I think that's it. Still that's good enough. It does not make it splashable nor spammable, but it's sure playable, turnning the cards above into "Monster Reborn"s is just enough. Also, a walking Iron Wall that escapes destruction (well, battle destruction) can be annoying. Suggestions: Well, only one. Make both its SS and returning effects optional by adding "You can" before actions. It could be a typo, or you might be using it as drawback or to make sure it does not miss time, which I understand for the first effect but not the second. All the cards I listed above need this to be in grave or deck, so forcing it back into hand does not help (Again, I assume its unintentional). Hope I helped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yosuke-kun Posted August 1, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2013 It does help thanks. I was actually trying to decide on whether I should make it optional or not with the second effect, but decide to go with not so that you can't just kill it off then use use Monster Reincarnation or something to SS it again, but making the first effect optional would probably balance it out a little more. Again, thanks for the feedback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaZgUly Posted August 1, 2013 Report Share Posted August 1, 2013 unique and cool 0-0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.