Buster Sweeper

[girostrike]

First card on RC. Crossing my fingers.
 

 

LORE: This card cannot attack unless you Tribute 1 monster on your side of the field. This card can attack all monsters your opponent controls once each.

I used "Asura Spirit" and "Panther Warrior" as templates. Each of those has their cost and this card should be a good balance between the two. 
I read through the OCG guide but there may be 1 or 2 things worded wrong.

This is card #1 in a "booster set" of sorts containing random cards. More to come.

[Galkin]

The problem with this card is how it already costs you 1 monster to perform the first attack, which most cards do costlessly as per game mechanics. Also, it is highly outclassed by Koa'ki Meiru Bergzak that does the same thing(practically) for no cost. As it is, it's underpowered for the same reasons as Panther Warrior: It costs you valuable resources to attack. If you ask me, what you need to fix is the payoff for the tribute. Attacking all monsters isn't that big and deal anyways, especially when its cost is heavy.

 

So, I suggest a temporary ATK boost when you tribute a monster, then give it some protection to top it off, also, get rid of the cost for the first attack, its ATK is nowhere near remarkable for that. It could look like this:

 

After damage calculations, if your opponent controls a monster: You can Tribute 1 monster you control; this card can attack once more during the Battle Phase, also, when it declares an attack this turn, Trap Cards cannot be activated and, until the End Phase, it gains 400 ATK. This card cannot battle with the same Monster Card twice per turn.

With that, I suggest you lower its DEF somewhere below 1500. A card such as this hardly serves a purpose in defense (and defense in itself has been on a decline in terms of effectiveness) and all it will do is give someone reason to say "it's overpowered" despite it not contributing much to this card's actual worth.

 

Yeah, I had to reword that effect a lot more than I though I would, hardly looks like the same effect at times...

[girostrike]

Ok I see what you mean. Good points.
And yeah, the DEF was something I was also foreseeing to be a problem. 

Thank you very much for the feedback. I'll get straight on it.