dandandalaxy3 Posted November 22, 2013 Report Share Posted November 22, 2013 I havent posted in aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagggggggggggggggeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesssssssssssssssssss. :)!! So I'm posting now: This card is for my new archetype; I've decided to leave my enemy evader archetype behind :(. 23rd November: Changed monster's attack to 2400; made it rock type and changed it's effect a little. :) Lore: This card cannot be destroyed by battle and you take no Battle Damage from battles involving this card. This card is destroyed unless you have less than 1000 Life Points. While this card is in your hand, you can discard it to reduce your Life Points to 100; then you can destroy all cards on the field. When this card attacks any Battle Damage your opponent takes is halved. Your opponent cannot increase or decrease your Life Points whilst this card is on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitsuneko Posted November 23, 2013 Report Share Posted November 23, 2013 Shouldn't he be a rock? Regardless, a very interesting card, albeit super dangerous to play. Very good at pulling off OTKs ;3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted November 23, 2013 Report Share Posted November 23, 2013 That's very dangerous to play with that card, since 100 LP is a very easy to get rid of even a powerful wall such as this card is on your field, well this card can be easily taken down by a card effect (which I suggest u should have some protection i.e. "This card cannot be destroyed by other card effects" or Sth like that.) and even you do, there is a popular card named "Upstart Goblin" XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted November 23, 2013 Report Share Posted November 23, 2013 2600 is a little high for a Level 4, all things considered. Maybe add a Summoning requirement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandandalaxy3 Posted November 23, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2013 Shouldn't he be a rock? Regardless, a very interesting card, albeit super dangerous to play. Very good at pulling off OTKs ;3 Yh it should be rock! That's very dangerous to play with that card, since 100 LP is a very easy to get rid of even a powerful wall such as this card is on your field, well this card can be easily taken down by a card effect (which I suggest u should have some protection i.e. "This card cannot be destroyed by other card effects" or Sth like that.) and even you do, there is a popular card named "Upstart Goblin" XD Hmm... how about if I add your opponent cannot increase or decrease your lifepoints will this card is on the field! 2600 is a little high for a Level 4, all things considered. Maybe add a Summoning requirement? I don't think so. Considering everything! Ok, I'll bring it down to 2400. I'm gonna edit the card now! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PinesolOfChaos Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 The last line should probably be reworded as: "Any increase or decrease in your Life Points due to the effect of a card owned by your opponent is reduced to 0." This allows your opponent to still inflict battle damage by attacking other monsters (unless you also don't want to take damage/gain LP period while he's on the field). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandandalaxy3 Posted November 24, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 The last line should probably be reworded as: "Any increase or decrease in your Life Points due to the effect of a card owned by your opponent is reduced to 0." This allows your opponent to still inflict battle damage by attacking other monsters (unless you also don't want to take damage/gain LP period while he's on the field). Yh you shouldn't be able to take any sort of damage; also check out the set and comment on that from the multiple cards section. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.