Flamember

[death00]

This is a three card set.

first: 

 Flamember Chick 

Lore:

  When this card is destroyed or Banished, you may discard one card, Special Summon, from your hand, deck, or grave, "Flamember Dragon", ignoring it's summoning conditions.

 

second:

 Flamember Dragon

Lore:

  This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can be Special Summoned by Tributing two monsters. While this card is on the field: Every time your opponent declares an attack, this card's original ATK and Def become 500 more than they were before the attack. If this card is destroyed, or Banished, by battle or a card effect, Special Summon one "Flamember Darkness Dragon" from your hand, deck, or grave.

 

third:

  Flamember Darkness Dragon

Lore:

  This card is also treated as a Dark Attribute monster. This card's ATK and DEF are equal to double the original ATK and DEF of the "Flamember" monster whose effect summoned it. While this card is on the field, no Trap or Spell cards can be activated. If this card is destroyed or Banish, Special Summon one "Flamember Chick" from your hand, deck, or grave.

[that random guy]

Just to clear up my confusion no offense meant because I like the concept.

Wouldnt flamember darkness dragon's ATK and DEF always be 0.

Personally i would make the effect a little more clear to aviod confusion something like this.

 

This cards attribute is also treated as a Dark. This card's ATK and DEF are equal to double the original ATK and DEF of the "Flamember" monster that summoned it when it was still on the field. While this card is on the field, no Trap or Spell cards can be activated. If this card is destroyed or Banished, Special Summon one "Flamember Chick" from your hand, deck, or graveyard.

 

I dont know how to exactly phrase it though. (yes i edited the text whilst typing it again)

 

I have no complaints personally i think flamember is a little underpowered but overall i think this is good

 

P.S. If I broke any rules by doing this i haven't been on this site in 4 years. I read them but might have overlooked something if so please tell me and i will edit my post.

[death00]

thanks for the edit, yeah i'm pretty sure your right, but not completely, so i'd like to wait for someone else to comment.

[that random guy]

thanks for the edit, yeah i'm pretty sure your right, but not completely, so i'd like to wait for someone else to comment.

 Just trying to help whenever i can thought it was a fun archtype 2 so i thought i contributed