Lords of Seasons

[death00]

Lord of Seasons: Autumn

  Lore:

Once per turn, when your opponent declares an attack; you may discard a card from your hand: end the battle phase.

 

Lord of Seasons: Winter

  Lore:

While this card is on the field, if your opponent declares an attack, they cannot declare an attack on their next turn.

 

Lord of Seasons: Spring

  Lore:

If this card is on the field at the end of your opponents turn: This card's original ATK and DEF points become equal to double it's original ATK and DEF points, respectively, to what they were on your opponents End Phase. 

 

Lord of Seasons: Summer

  Lore:

While this card is on the field, any damage your opponent takes from Fire Attribute or Pyro-Type monsters is doubled.

[Gregory the Gregory]

So many OCG errors.

It would be better if they were just Lord of Autumn, Lord of Summer, Lord of Spring, and Lord of Summer.

No such thing as Ice-type.

[death00]

what are the errors?

[~~~~]

I actually like the names. It allows you to give them support Spells and Traps later, if you want, as "Lord of" would not be a very good archetype name, in my opinion. I also like the art for Autumn and Winter, but the art for Spring looks stretched horizontally. The art for Summer looks slightly stretched vertically, but you could get away with that. I really like the idea, and I think it could be expanded on to make a whole "Seasons" archetype, with "Seasons: Spring" ect. being sub-archetypes.

 

However: I think they are all overpowered. Others may disagree, but they seem overpowered to me. :unsure:  Spring's effect is either very OP or basically meaningless depending on how you interpret the last part.

 

OCG: Teddie is right, there are a lot of OCG errors. In order:

 

Autumn should read: "Once per turn, when your opponent declares an attack; you may discard a card from your hand: end the battle phase."

Okay, simple, just punctuation, and I may be nit-picking, but this is easy for me to correct, and I like the effect.

 

Winter is pretty much correct as far as I can tell.

 

With Spring, the text on the card is different from the lore text below it. I have already said that I don't like the effect, but to keep in the spirit of it I would write something like: "If this card is face-up on the field during the End Phase of your opponent's turn: This card's ATK and DEF points become equal to double it's original ATK and DEF points, respectively.......???????" Sorry, but I don't really understand your intention in this last part.

 

Summer: You need to write "FIRE" not "Fire Attribute". "Pyro-Type" instead of "Pyro Type". I would suggest to simply leave out the "While this card is on the field", as for continuous effects like this one, it is already assumed that the card must be face-up on the field for the effect to activate (unless specifically stated otherwise). As for "whether it's battle damage or effect damage", I have no idea how to rephrase this, but I really does need rephrasing somehow. I would personally change it to leave out the effect damage and just say: "Battle damage your opponent takes from FIRE or Pyro-Type monsters is doubled." You might want to add in an "and/or" instead of "or", but I really wouldn't know. 

 

There are other things that I like and dislike about the cards, but I will wait to see if you are OK with my review so far, esp. as it is quite long already.

 

EDIT: Oh and yes, there is no Ice-Type. I would probably suggest something like Aqua-Type if you want to keep to official Types.

[death00]

thank you