frostwolf240 Posted May 18, 2014 Report Share Posted May 18, 2014 Just after some feedback on my grammar. Planning to make 2 decks. One with final fantasy main characters and one with final fantasy main villains. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rydersilver Posted May 18, 2014 Report Share Posted May 18, 2014 This is completely broken because its super generic and has weak restrictions. Its like an improved version of summoner monk (which is semi limited) because 1. It has 1800 atk 2. Its light 3. And most importantly it doesnt require any cost, such as discarding a spell, or another card 4. Its very generic, as its levels 1-4, and can make synchroes and xyzs for no cost 5. its pool is from the hand deck or grave. It should be one of those 6. its not even once per turn, so you can summon something that can tribute itself for endless plusses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas the Flame Posted May 18, 2014 Report Share Posted May 18, 2014 Should this not be in Pop Culture? Well, anyways, this card, as rydersilver said, is indeed broken. You most definitely need to lower the atk down to around 1600, add a cost, like banishing to the effect, make the effect once per turn, and make it from ether the grave, or hand, not hand, deck, or grave. 1/10 (for the art work, you get one point) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zobian Posted May 18, 2014 Report Share Posted May 18, 2014 Really all that can be said has already, it's too broken to see any play, it'd be banned in an instant. And yeah I think this should be in pop culture cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frostwolf240 Posted May 21, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 21, 2014 i understand i have some work to do. as for it being a light attribute, it is a final hero after all. and luneth was indeed a warrior of light. but the rest i will look into. how about lower attack (say 1500) and banish to special summon monster from hand or grave only? but pertaining to my original question is the grammar ok. or does that need to be looked at. been a very long time since i even owned a card so im a bit rusty with the ocg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted May 21, 2014 Report Share Posted May 21, 2014 but pertaining to my original question is the grammar ok. or does that need to be looked at. been a very long time since i even owned a card so im a bit rusty with the ocg For the current iteration, the text should be as follows: "If this card is the only monster on the field: You can Special Summon 1 Level 4 or lower Warrior-Type monster from your hand, Deck or Graveyard in face-up Attack Position." The colon : is part of the new grammar system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.