3 Monsters from my new Set. Probably very good cards.

[Beerus]

 

Destroy this card if you control monster Special Summoned from the Extra Deck. Each time "Night Assassinator"monsters attack: increase ATK of this card by 100. When this card becomes attack target of Xyz,Synchro,Fusion or Pendulum Monster: banish this card and attacking monster. Once per Duel: You can return this banished card to your Graveyard; Special Summon up to 2 banished "Night Assassinator" monsters.

 

 

Destroy this card if you control monster Special Summoned from the Extra Deck. When this monster attack Xyz,Fusion,Synchro or Pendulum monster return that monster to Extra Deck after Damage Calculation. You can banish this card from your Graveyard: Destroy all face-up "Night Assassinator" monsters; Special Summon 1 monster from your Extra Deck. You must control at least 1 face-up "Night Assassinator" to activate this effect.

 

 

Destroy this card if you control monster Special Summoned from the Extra Deck. While you control another "Night Assassinator" this card cannot be destroyed by battle with Xyz,Synchro,Fusion or Pendulum Monsters. If this card is destroyed by effect that comes from Xyz,Synchro or Fusion Monster: target 1 card on the field; destroy that target.

[-Dom-]

I get what you are going for here, but the wording could be a lot better generally (my OCG isn't perfect so I wont correct you) and you could say "a monster Special Summoned from the Extra Deck" instead of Xyz, Synchro or Fusion every time. Also, I think the cards are just a bit weak and xyz would still probably laugh at them: for example, the first is a less generic D.D. Warrior Lady, while the second is a less generic, less useful Grand mole, yet those still aren't used (in abundance). I think all 3 need to be stronger if you're limiting yourself so much- I like the anti-meta archetype idea though.

[Beerus]

I get what you are going for here, but the wording could be a lot better generally (my OCG isn't perfect so I wont correct you) and you could say "a monster Special Summoned from the Extra Deck" instead of Xyz, Synchro or Fusion every time. Also, I think the cards are just a bit weak and xyz would still probably laugh at them: for example, the first is a less generic D.D. Warrior Lady, while the second is a less generic, less useful Grand mole, yet those still aren't used (in abundance). I think all 3 need to be stronger if you're limiting yourself so much- I like the anti-meta archetype idea though.

I know that OCG isn't perfect. In the next few days I'll add some new cards and update these 3 cards. I add them to see what should I change in their effects to make the Set batter.

[Beerus]

updated

[Lazerface]

like the idea for anti meta but empoledom is correct, they either need to be stonger or have less restrictions, especially versing the current meta usually bounceing back an xyz holds off the opponent for a turn (unless he/she has exhausted their resources). that being said isee this as a comeback deck that if you play passive and wait  you can make a big push to win.(ex: Destroy all face-up "Night Assassinator" monsters; Special Summon 1 monster from your Extra Deck. You must control at least 1 face-up "Night Assassinator" to activate this effect.)using that effect to get a card like star eater in a late game can usually give you the win especially if your opponents field is blank of a monster.