Ignis avis Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 [spoiler="Written Card"] Servant of Tsukuyomi Rank 4 Light 2 Level 4 monsters Once per turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card, then target 1 face-up Attack Position monster your opponent controls; change it to face-down Defense Position. At the start of the Damage Step, if this card attacked a face-down Defense Position monster: Destroy that monster.. 2300/1600 [/spoiler] The combination of flipping a monster face-down plus the automatic destruction of a face-down monster when it attacks one might be too strong, but I thought it would be an interesting combination. Also thought about having it attack again when it destroys a face-down monster instead of it's current attack effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krakonfour Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 I actually like this card, but I think the last restriction makes it unplayable. 2 Level 4 monsters Once per turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card, then target 1 face-up Attack Position monster your opponent controls; change it to face-down Defense Position. At the start of the Damage Step, if this card attacked a face-down Defense Position monster: Destroy that monster. This card can not attack face-up monsters. You really have have to compare it to Maestroke the Symphony Djinn. Maestroke has 2300 defense, Servant has 2300 attack. Both can flip a monster face-down. Maestroke has a defensive ability, Servant has an offensive ability.... it is this symmetry that makes a balanced card. Adding the "can not attack face-up monsters" part unnecessarily weakens it and destroys the offensive theme is had going on. I suggest you simply remove it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ignis avis Posted July 7, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Thanks. I'll take that into consideration. I was afraid that that the combination might have been overpowered, so I added the final restriction as kind of an afterthought. edit: I went ahead and removed the "can not attack face up monsters" restriction based on the feedback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krakonfour Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Thanks. I'll take that into consideration. I was afraid that that the combination might have been overpowered, so I added the final restriction as kind of an afterthought. edit: I went ahead and removed the "can not attack face up monsters" restriction based on the feedback. Now it's a great card, an offensive counterpart to Maestroke I'd love to play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.