M0B0X Posted August 14, 2014 Report Share Posted August 14, 2014 Tribute 1 face-up DARK monster you control. Activate 1 of these effects: ● Your opponent randomly selects and discards 1 card from their hand. ● Inflict 300 points of damage to your opponent for each card in their hand. Tribute 1 face-up LIGHT monster you control. Activate 1 of these effects: ● Special Summon 1 LIGHT monster from your Graveyard. ● Gain 4000 Life Points. Please Rate, Fix and Comment. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kivoxo Posted August 14, 2014 Report Share Posted August 14, 2014 Evil's first option is a bit too strong for only costing a dark monster and the second is very basic yet costly. I'd rework just discarding an opponents card but make it cost more. Good's first option is useful but also can be pointless and the second is beyond broken. I suggest reworking the second or just removing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nazryl Posted August 14, 2014 Report Share Posted August 14, 2014 I think Evil is a really good card. It isn't overpowered and it's a lose two cards to your opponents one. I don't think it would see competitive play but as a balanced card, It's really good! Good is OPd in my opinion. The ability to SS any light monster for no cost all all is pretty powerful. Placing a restriction on the card such as level 4 or lower or even a attack cap, such as 200 or lower or something like it would make the first effect much more balanced. Same with the second effect, it is slightly to Opd so lowering the gain to 2000 would help the cards balance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M0B0X Posted August 15, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2014 Evil's first option is a bit too strong for only costing a dark monster and the second is very basic yet costly. I'd rework just discarding an opponents card but make it cost more. Good's first option is useful but also can be pointless and the second is beyond broken. I suggest reworking the second or just removing. I think Evil is a really good card. It isn't overpowered and it's a lose two cards to your opponents one. I don't think it would see competitive play but as a balanced card, It's really good! Good is OPd in my opinion. The ability to SS any light monster for no cost all all is pretty powerful. Placing a restriction on the card such as level 4 or lower or even a attack cap, such as 200 or lower or something like it would make the first effect much more balanced. Same with the second effect, it is slightly to Opd so lowering the gain to 2000 would help the cards balance. First of all I would like to point out that with both of these cards you are losing advantage a lot more than you are gaining it. With both of them its at least a -1 in card advantage, so yeah, I wouldnt call any of these broken cards. They require Specific cost. With Evil you lose a DARK monster and your opponent either loses a card from hand or takes some damage, I wouldnt call that OP'd. With Good you either lose a LIGHT monster to recover another one or gain some points. How is this broken again? Anyway thank you both for the feedback, I would still like a proper analysis though. Bump! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kivoxo Posted August 15, 2014 Report Share Posted August 15, 2014 With both of them its at least a -1 in card advantage, so yeah, I wouldnt call any of these broken cards. They require Specific cost. With Evil you lose a DARK monster and your opponent either loses a card from hand or takes some damage, I wouldnt call that OP'd. With Good you either lose a LIGHT monster to recover another one or gain some points. How is this broken again? 1 DARK for a discard would mostly be a stalemate and would even be advantageous for a deck like Infernities. 1 DARK for Life Points is really minuscule and almost useless. 1 LIGHT for a special summon of a LIGHT would be pointless at times and could be a silly solution to things like Fiendish Chain. 1 LIGHT for 4000 Life Points is crazy high, no cost possible would make up for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The15thWing Posted August 15, 2014 Report Share Posted August 15, 2014 With Good you either lose a LIGHT monster to recover another one or gain some points. How is this broken again? Anyway thank you both for the feedback, I would still like a proper analysis though. Losing ANY Light Monster, to get ANY Light Monster from your Grave, when one of the decks in our format is Lightsworn, which would then be able to use this in every scenario instead of cards like Monster Reincarnation, making this much less costly than you seem to make it out. As for the secondary effect, it's really broken. For the cost of A SINGLE Light Monster, you can gain half your LP back. That's not healthy at all. As for Evil, I really like it, but Good needs to be nerfed hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M0B0X Posted August 16, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 Thank you all for the comments and opinions, I appreciate the feedback. But, I still dont think any of these cards is broken. About Good: Losing a card and a LIGHT monster for another monster is a -1 in card advantage and is not broken at all. Also, Losing a card and a LIGHT monster for any amount of LP(not just 4000) is not broken and is a -2 in card advantage. Life Points dont matter except for your last ones. I would still like more feedback. Bump! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M0B0X Posted August 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 Bump! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Im the prince of the ring! Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 Thank you all for the comments and opinions, I appreciate the feedback. But, I still dont think any of these cards is broken. About Good: Losing a card and a LIGHT monster for another monster is a -1 in card advantage and is not broken at all. Also, Losing a card and a LIGHT monster for any amount of LP(not just 4000) is not broken and is a -2 in card advantage. Life Points dont matter except for your last ones. I would still like more feedback. Bump! But it's still about the fact that good can regain half of your Lp for 1 LIGHT monster. Even for a weak light monster like ryko or even effect veiler. Sure you'll lose that monster, but what if that monster couldn't do anything? effect was negated or it couldn't attack. Most light deck used in the meta have the capability to either benefit in the grave or be ss'd back from the graveyard. Bujins can really abuse this card like nobody's business. if you edit the second effect, then it'll be fine. As of now, there's literally no reason to use the 1st effect since the 2nd effect can already bring you up to an already great advantage. as for bad, I don't really have any problem with it; just be careful of dark worlds, then it's deadly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Im the prince of the ring! Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 Also...hieratics abuse this card like no tomorrow because you can tribute a hieratic monster which are all light attribute, gain 4k and ss a normal dragon type monster. Hows that for being non broken? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roeyba Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 Unlable'd, you need to take feedback rightly. It's true that it's not fun that almost all feedback's negative and that we aren't judges or anything, but you still should try and listen- we're all here to help. (At least I know I am). Now Evil is one awesome card, I'd use it for certain decks. None of it's effects are OP. Good, though, I can agree it's slightly broken... Here's a table of suggestions: If unlimited: LIGHT monster with 2000 or less ATK\2000 LP. If semi-limited: LIGHT monster with 2000 or less ATK\3000 LP. If limited: LIGHT monster with 3000 or less ATK\3000 LP. Or maybe 2000 or less ATK ignoring summoning conditions. You can keep it the same if banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.