Darklight Envoy Dragon!

[FairGamer]

From the Darkest of the Night,

To Morning of the radiant Light,

To seal the fate of this fight,

O chaos Dragon, take flight.

 

 

 

1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner monsters
This card is also treated as DARK while face-up on the field. Once per turn, during your turn or your opponent's Battle Phase: You can target 1 face-up monster; this card loses 500 ATK and DEF, then banish that target until the End Phase. (this is a Quick effect).

 

I really liked the way Synchros were summoned in anime and how duelist were connected to monsters, so I made one of those. It's kinda lanternish I know, but its awesome :D

anyway, feel free to comment and rate :)

[The15thWing]

Ok, this card is OP, for a couple of reasons:

 

It's Generic: This card can be used in any deck that can make Level 8 Synchros, and is superior to most due to...

 

Banishing the opponent's Monster: This card Banishes a Monster, instead of destroying it. Now think about the fact that cards like Beelze are powerful partially due to the fact they have protection against destruction. Heck, cards like Stardust Dragon are run just to prevent it. This card, however, gets around them, and does it for almost no cost.

 

It can be used during either player's turn: This is probably the most powerful part of this card. It allows this card to Banish Monsters your opponent just summoned, or needs to summon, or is even attacking with, for the cost of just 500/500. Not to mention, Banished Xyz Monsters lose their attached Materials. It can also Banish itself to renew it's base Stats. This card needs extreme nerfing.

 

While the card only gets rid of those cards until the End Phase, that's still an incredible effect to have.

 

 

New Card ideas:

 

Take away the "Either Player's Turn" part of the card, making it more situational.

Change "Banish" to "Destroy."

Make it harder to summon, such as needing the Monsters used to be Light/Dark.

Increase the number of Non-Tuners needed to summon it from 1 to 2.

 

These are just suggestions, but if you use one, you probably only need to use that single one.

[FairGamer]

First of all thanks for the review and yes, I see your point. I got way carried away. I imagined playing this card against Lightsworn or any other OP deck but didn't think if they got it, :D but hey the game is full of OP monsters and beezle is one of them :D I think I'm gonna change the timing of the effect. Make it more triggerish :D

[Chiz Fri]

The15thWing explained the power of this card, so I guess I'll address the grammar.

 

Since the last update of the OCG, constant treatment as more than one type has been reworded simply to "This card is also treated as (ATTRIBUTE/TYPE/CARD NAME)(CONDITIONS OF THIS EFFECT)." So this card would now read:

 

This card is also treated as DARK while face-up on the field.

While not a huge change, it is now correct.

 

Now onto the second effect. I'll give you the correction first this time, so I can gather my thoughts:

 

Once per turn, during either player's turn: You can target 1 face-up monster on the field and have this card lose 500 ATK; banish that target until the End Phase.

The whole point of PSCT was to help differentiate effect from cost. This states the ATK drop is a cost. If it was part of the effect...

 

Once per turn, during either player's turn: You can target 1 face-up monster on the field; this card loses 500 ATK, then banish that target until the End Phase.

What this does is set up an order of events with "then" instead of a priority decision with "and." This makes the card easier to resolve in the long run.

 

Hopefully that helps. I just wanted to show you what kind of problems arise when you use the word "and" as apposed to "then."

[FairGamer]

The15thWing explained the power of this card, so I guess I'll address the grammar.

 

Since the last update of the OCG, constant treatment as more than one type has been reworded simply to "This card is also treated as (ATTRIBUTE/TYPE/CARD NAME)(CONDITIONS OF THIS EFFECT)." So this card would now read:

While not a huge change, it is now correct.

 

Now onto the second effect. I'll give you the correction first this time, so I can gather my thoughts:

The whole point of PSCT was to help differentiate effect from cost. This states the ATK drop is a cost. If it was part of the effect...

What this does is set up an order of events with "then" instead of a priority decision with "and." This makes the card easier to resolve in the long run.

 

Hopefully that helps. I just wanted to show you what kind of problems arise when you use the word "and" as apposed to "then."

Thanks a lot for taking time and explaining, I used them all in this edit. (Hopefully correctly) :D

 

Edited: After thinking it over and over I could only give up opponents Main Phase :D still dont want to give up BP and I dont think its OP uless Exciton is banned :D Thats my demends!