Master Hyperion Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 Madolche CottonsortsEARTHLevel 4[Warrior/Effect](This card's name is always treated as "Madolche Puddingcess".)When this card in your possession is destroyed by your opponent's card (either by battle or by card effect) and sent to your Graveyard: Shuffle this card into the Deck. Once per turn, if you control a Level 3 "Madolche" monster: You can reduce this card's Level by 1. You cannot Special Summon other monsters during the turn you activated this effect, except for "Madolche" monsters.ATK/1000 DEF/1000Madolche GumbreakerEARTHRank 3[Beast-Warrior/Xyz/Effect]2 Level 3 "Madolche" monstersOnce per turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card, then target 1 monster your opponent controls; Destroy that target, and if you do, you can send 1 "Madolche" card from your Deck to the Graveyard. During the turn you activated this effect, this card cannot attack and you cannot Special Summon other monsters, except for "Madolche" monsters.ATK/1500 DEF/1000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmo. Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 Since Madolches have always been mah babies (been playing 'em since they first came out) , i wanna be the first to judge your support. The monsters overall seem really good, but their types and names break the usual madolche scheme, for example Cottonsorts, it needs to be the name of the sweet+the name of a servant in this case, while Gumbreaker can't be a beast-warrior, since there has never been one before, it would have to be something else (warrior/spellcaster if servant or fairy if royalty, or beast if animal) + the name of the servant (like Marmelmaid: marmalade + maid) or if an animal the sound that they make + a sweet (Mewfuille: Meow + millefuille). Except for breaking that scheme, the cards seem good and can be good to fasten the deck up a bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.