Tyrus, Heavy Warrior

[Atypical-Abbie]

Defense Position battler and Beast-Warrior support.

 

 

When this card is Normal Summoned: You can change it to Defense Position. This card can attack while in face-up Defense Position. If it does, apply its DEF for damage calculation. If this card inflicts battle damage to your opponent while in Defense Position: You can target 1 Beast-Warrior-Type monster in your  Graveyard; Special Summon that target in Defense Position. You can only use this effect of “Tyrus, Heavy Warrior” once per turn.

 

[RedEmissaryofDarkness]

So it's a Superheavy without being a Superheavy? and really I think it is a detriment to the card's usage. If it was a Superheavy, I would run Instantly, but because it is a generic Beast-Warrior, it is greatly overshadowed by Coach Soldier Wolfbark, and really this card would not see that much usage. Really that's the only problem with it. If it was just a Superheavy, it would be good, but because it isn't, it's limited in usage

[Atypical-Abbie]

So it's a Superheavy without being a Superheavy? and really I think it is a detriment to the card's usage. If it was a Superheavy, I would run Instantly, but because it is a generic Beast-Warrior, it is greatly overshadowed by Coach Soldier Wolfbark, and really this card would not see that much usage. Really that's the only problem with it. If it was just a Superheavy, it would be good, but because it isn't, it's limited in usage

Wolfbark can't get every Beast-Warrior, it's actually pretty restricted in what it can do.

[RedEmissaryofDarkness]

Wolfbark can't get every Beast-Warrior, it's actually pretty restricted in what it can do.

True, but in the decks where it is going to really matter, it is still limited more than Wolfbarks. Gladiator beasts would rather just keep running Darius and Laquari, Fire Fists would much rather have Wolfbark, and X-Saber would not try to run this in risk of clogging. 

 

As a generic, it still has rather limited usage considering the rogue version of Beast-Warriors are not that good, and the only archetypes which people run of it would not want to run it. It comes down to the fact that it has to declare an attack and inflict damage in a game where they likely have Dante, Valkyrus, Construct, Any Qliphort, Horse Prince, Gyzarus, Red-Eyes etc. etc. established and not leave their rather weak monsters in a compromising position. That, and Fiendish Chain, which has seen more play, is this card's worst nightmare. 

 

I'm sure it has a use, but it is very limited. If i revised the card, i would do either 1 of 2 things

1. Make it a Superheavy

2. Instead of DMG infliction, just make it a destroys a card by battle clause, and it can fix some of its issues and may even let people run it in Gladiator Beasts to go from Darius to Bestiari and Even some plays potentially in Fire FIsts. 

 

I am really not trying to be harsh on you or this card. It's just the impression I got from it. I hope you understand where my plight in this is.

[Atypical-Abbie]

True, but in the decks where it is going to really matter, it is still limited more than Wolfbarks. Gladiator beasts would rather just keep running Darius and Laquari, Fire Fists would much rather have Wolfbark, and X-Saber would not try to run this in risk of clogging. 

 

As a generic, it still has rather limited usage considering the rogue version of Beast-Warriors are not that good, and the only archetypes which people run of it would not want to run it. It comes down to the fact that it has to declare an attack and inflict damage in a game where they likely have Dante, Valkyrus, Construct, Any Qliphort, Horse Prince, Gyzarus, Red-Eyes etc. etc. established and not leave their rather weak monsters in a compromising position. That, and Fiendish Chain, which has seen more play, is this card's worst nightmare. 

 

I'm sure it has a use, but it is very limited. If i revised the card, i would do either 1 of 2 things

1. Make it a Superheavy

2. Instead of DMG infliction, just make it a destroys a card by battle clause, and it can fix some of its issues and may even let people run it in Gladiator Beasts to go from Darius to Bestiari and Even some plays potentially in Fire FIsts. 

 

I am really not trying to be harsh on you or this card. It's just the impression I got from it. I hope you understand where my plight in this is.

It doesn't matter if a card has limited use, what use it has can still be good, you just need to think of more uses than what you have. Making it a Superheavy support makes no bloody sense, making it destroy by battle is in my opinion worse since you can't use it to attack directly with, plus cards which have protection effects are also an issue.