Sea Serpent Cards #1

[avariademon]

well ok a recent post about originality got me to thinking about originality. so it got me thinking, what creature type is the least often used originally i was thinking betwean thunder and sea serpent, i looked at the total number of different sea serpent type monsters and geuss what there were only 11 of them.

 

YEAH 11! PATHETIC so i took matters into my own hands and decided to work on a "set" of cards based around sea surpent type monsters, most creature types have something about it that makes it different then other creature types, so i thought what would a sea serpent be all about... i thought about the sea serpent in general sea serpents are huge monsters, you would be lucky to find more then one in a single place. and it hit me, solitary monsters, monsters that get better when they are alone on the feild.

 

now true its been done before in (off the top of my head) 3 cards, flash assailent (which is more of a gets worse with more monsters) blade knight (better with none) and infernal incenerator (again worse with more) but not to much to really exploit the idea, thing is if you only are aloud one monster that monster better be good, so i decided on a few different types of sea serpents and this is one of the basic ones:

 

 

this monster is useable with other monsters on the feild but if you want him to be DECENT then you got to play him by himself.

 

now im not sure if its overpowered or not, alot of the monsters are like this (not exactly, just seems overpowered alone) my concern is if you run so many of them a first turn this (or worse a monster im going to post) could seriously be bad for your opponent. and could seem quite broken, however later in the game when things start picking up and your opponent has monsters at the desposal, that one monster dosent seem so harmful, so any how please rate and fix this card so i can make sure it's ballenced and it pushes the envelope.

 

oh and the image is not mine I got the image from: http://www.lockntoad.com/homyguyz/sea_serpent.jpg

[peacekid]

Punctuation, Capitalization.

[Devil card creator]

pathetic :? surpent :? serpint :? feild:? aloud :? alot :? concern :? dosent :? envelope :? NICE WORDS, NOT!!!!!!!!!!

[peacekid]

You're just as bad as the OP, moron.

[avariademon]

lol funny cause <,< im the one with negative rep correct? if spelling errors are the only things you guys can see that is wrong then im feeling pretty good, oh ands so nice of you to COME BACK

[Chevalier]

Let me begin by asking, did you purposely spell "serpent" in the card's name incorrectly?

Moving on, the card's effect is a bit bland. You so much space to enhance the card even more that the possibilities are nearly endless. Unfortunately, your OCG is a bit off

Correct OCG:

If this is the only card on your side of the field, this card gains 500 ATK.

 

Just a few errors. Work on a new effect and I'm sure it'll turn out for the better.

 

Hope I Helped

[avariademon]

Let me begin by asking' date=' did you purposely spell "serpent" in the card's name incorrectly?

Moving on, the card's effect is a bit bland. You so much space to enhance the card even more that the possibilities are nearly endless. Unfortunately, your OCG is a bit off

Correct OCG:

If this is the only card on your side of the field, this card gains 500 ATK.

 

Just a few errors. Work on a new effect and I'm sure it'll turn out for the better.

 

Hope I Helped

 

 

no no i didnt purposly misspell it was a mistake i will correct it asap. the reason why it is so bland is its the BASIC form of sea serpent, not to interesting not to powerful i know its bland but alot of my other creatures are a bit less bland then again i duknow ANY how in adittion your OCG correction, would it not make it so that would be if it is the only card on the feild (as in no monsters ANY spells and traps? (in retrospect not what im looking for). i used blade knight to word this so yeah, there are at least 2 others like this please i need to know if thats correct in its only if its the only monster on the feild. OR if your way is correct for only one MONSTER on the feild. the spelling errors will be corrected AFTER i get the wording correct and when that happens i will update so it looks a bit better.

[CrabHelmet]

Overpowered.

[ender4449]

Let me begin by asking' date=' did you purposely spell "serpent" in the card's name incorrectly?

Moving on, the card's effect is a bit bland. You so much space to enhance the card even more that the possibilities are nearly endless. Unfortunately, your OCG is a bit off

Correct OCG:

If this is the only card on your side of the field, this card gains 500 ATK.

 

Just a few errors. Work on a new effect and I'm sure it'll turn out for the better.

 

Hope I Helped

 

 

no no i didnt purposly misspell it was a mistake i will correct it asap. the reason why it is so bland is its the BASIC form of sea serpent, not to interesting not to powerful i know its bland but alot of my other creatures are a bit less bland then again i duknow ANY how in adittion your OCG correction, would it not make it so that would be if it is the only card on the feild (as in no monsters ANY spells and traps? (in retrospect not what im looking for). i used blade knight to word this so yeah, there are at least 2 others like this please i need to know if thats correct in its only if its the only monster on the feild. OR if your way is correct for only one MONSTER on the feild. the spelling errors will be corrected AFTER i get the wording correct and when that happens i will update so it looks a bit better.

 

if this monster is the only monster on your side of the field, it gains 500 ATK

 

that, i believe, is what you are looking for

[avariademon]

Overpowered.

 

do you perhaps know a manner to improve upon this card, perhaps make it more ballanced?

[Junk Raver]

Some card errors, and overpowered, lower its ATK or increase.

[CrabHelmet]

Overpowered.

 

do you perhaps know a manner to improve upon this card' date=' perhaps make it more ballanced?

[/quote']

 

Less ATK.

[avariademon]

edit, ok i beleive i have everything in order here i took away 200 attack from its original attack so it will only be 2100 alone. im not sure if thats not enough

[avariademon]

<,< >.> to the top? any one else?

[tonisanoob]

i would maybe add another effect the pic is good ^^

 

but change the name

 

to liek master of the abyys or somthing ^^

[avariademon]

i would maybe add another effect the pic is good ^^

 

but change the name

 

to liek master of the abyys or somthing ^^

 

well to be honest i would consider this monster one of the "basic" cards to the sea surpent set thus its effect is very basic. i do agree i like the picture as well, HOWEVER out of all the pictures i picked for the cards that i have made thus far, this was my least favorite (it was the most bland, there is another card with a very similar picture but the head has a bit more detail)

 

abys..... hmm i probably should incorperate that into some of my cards that is a decent thought, however this monster (again being the basic card) i would not consider "master of the abys" an appropriate name for this card. i know sea surpent is rather bland but again its a bland monster thus a bland name is not unacceptable. i might consider something a bit more detailed, however it shouldent be a horible overpowering sounding name. thank you for your comment