Shin Akuma Posted April 9, 2008 Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 i personally love the crystal beasts. so now i dedicate a new trap card if it hasnt been done already.the gems are from google. but the image itself was made by me using CS3. CRITISISMS PLZ!PS: again, i hate the "this card sucks" type of response. if you are going to say that, explain why; why does it not appeal to you and why its overpowered, as such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted April 9, 2008 Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 A little overpowered. May be a hand destroyer, but it can give an instant advantage. Abundance already does that well enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shin Akuma Posted April 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 well this card was made when i was thinking if i should rush them with crystal beasts and somehow bring back this card using a different effect or save it for later...i dunno, is it a rush or a momentary time to lure them into a big trap...i dunno, maybe it is too powerful.but the question is, do you sacrifice your hand for victory? its a gamble and thats how i like to do things. "Speak now or forever hold your peace." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faded Posted April 9, 2008 Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 It seems balanced? But would you need to say that you discard your hand to your graveyard, when thats where they would naturally be discarded to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted April 9, 2008 Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 Well, let's say you discard 3. It's only 3 beasts right? Summon a Carbuncle, pegasus and pegasus (in that order). Ruby's effect activates first, then pegasus 1 and 2 work and chain together. you get 2 beats with both peggy, then carbuncle summons all CB's. There's 5 monster for the price of 3. Balanced? not really Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shin Akuma Posted April 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 good question. but i believe to have to discard it somewhere."Discard one card from your hand to the graveyard," or "Discard one card from your hand." Which sounds more precise and OCG-like to you? Cuz it can go either way, according how you are saying. PS: If i sound sarcastic or ironic here, im not. Im actually being serious about how to say things. If it is worng, just correct me cuz i may not always be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shin Akuma Posted April 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 Well' date=' let's say you discard 3. It's only 3 beasts right? Summon a Carbuncle, pegasus and pegasus (in that order). Ruby's effect activates first, then pegasus 1 and 2 work and chain together. you get 2 beats with both peggy, then carbuncle summons all CB's. There's 5 monster for the price of 3. Balanced? not really[/quote'] Sorry for the double post but...Carbuncle says only to special summon from the Spell and Trap card zone. If its already there why bring it to the monster zone? Besides, isnt strategies like this make life easier to pull out hard, rare and difficult monsters? I understand your arguement, however this card was created to bring out the CB's as fast as possible in order to summon Rainbow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted April 9, 2008 Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 Well' date=' let's say you discard 3. It's only 3 beasts right? Summon a Carbuncle, pegasus and pegasus (in that order). Ruby's effect activates first, then pegasus 1 and 2 work and chain together. you get 2 beats with both peggy, then carbuncle summons all CB's. There's 5 monster for the price of 3. Balanced? not really[/quote'] Sorry for the double post but...Carbuncle says only to special summon from the Spell and Trap card zone. If its already there why bring it to the monster zone? Besides, isnt strategies like this make life easier to pull out hard, rare and difficult monsters? I understand your arguement, however this card was created to bring out the CB's as fast as possible in order to summon Rainbow. You have a good point there, but not everyone uses Rainbow. In a CB turbo deck, this would be all you need to use abundance and swing for game, which can be done pretty easy in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faded Posted April 9, 2008 Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 You can add in that the Crystal(s) Beast have to be different or cannot be the same, and Im not sure about my previous question. I just wouldve thought that but Im not entirely sure so I honestly cannot say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shin Akuma Posted April 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 it gets to a point where people are so good at picking out the necessaries from the unnecessaries that it becomes confusing. or maybe its just cuz my brain hurts from too much MATH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted April 9, 2008 Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 there's already a 'Counter Crystal' card that also places crystal beasts from your grave to the field as crystals,so this card is basically redundant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shin Akuma Posted April 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 i kinda thought so...by the time i find out about things, they have been done already...oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
v8561v Posted April 9, 2008 Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 Nice effect,balanced card....7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shin Akuma Posted April 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 BUMP! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 Crystal Recall looks balanced. Crystal Destruction is unplayably bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shin Akuma Posted April 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 i just reread it. i does sound stupid...lemme fix it...EDIT: FIXED! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.