Victory Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 Closed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldy 2.0 Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 Bad picture, bad puntuation, too strong effect. Good idea though!4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexander² Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 ...6/10, but it has OCG issues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie016 Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 Like the others before me posted, it has wayy to strong of an effect for a level 7 monster, and below decent ATK strength. If i have to give an example of a decent effect, please let me know and i will show you, cause i am on the verge of compeleting my yugioh set, and the effects i have done are truning out qutie nice. But if you need help in decied effects please i can help out the best i can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 Overpowered. Effect is pure +3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tefached Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 Here is my first Elite card i am now 5-star ackonodledge me!!!!Anyway here it is the artist is here Here first its acknowledge second as an elite member you should know to use proper spelling and ocg overpowered too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Supreme Gamesmaster Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 Bad grammar, and you put "and" where "or" is supposed to be. Okay, though. 6/10 mercifully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 For a 5 star member, you could do better. Level 7 doesn't make it balanced.The ATK thing is pointless, ATK is rarely valued.+3 destruction effect is good, too good.Pic needs background.Bad ocg I'm done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victory Posted April 14, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 yeah yeah....no im jk ill work on it i was just trying to make a good card!anyway the level is supposed to be 9 if that helpos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 yeah yeah....no im jk ill work on it i was just trying to make a good card!anyway the level is supposed to be 9 if that helpos Ooh, Thestalos does an extra 200 damage when he discards it, and it can't work with Cost Down. Clearly, the change from 7 to 9 makes the card totally balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N00B Hunter Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 What??? What's +3 destruction effect??? I'm so confused... my head is reeling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 What??? What's +3 destruction effect??? I'm so confused... my head is reeling Reading the card helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious eXcess Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 lulz... Card sucks. Bad OCG. Crud Pic....Nuff Sed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victory Posted April 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 wow your avi is WHOO....anyway the card level 9 is totally balanced the pic isnt that goood but its the only on ei found! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 wow your avi is WHOO....anyway the card level 9 is totally balanced the pic isnt that goood but its the only on ei found! Level 7 = 2 tributes.Easily reasonable / monster gateable. Level 9 = 2 tributes.Easily reasonable / monster gateable.No cost down! Oh noes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Supreme Gamesmaster Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 Alright, we get it. Card sucks. Can we leave this alone now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victory Posted April 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 NOOO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawlyn Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 Enough has been said about the poor grammar, OCG text, and image (seriously - you should get yourself an image editing tool and crop that image down... what's with all the empty space at the top?!) bu there's one more issue that I can see: Do you mean "Monster, Spell and Trap" or "Monster, Spell or Trap"? Destroying three cards just because it's destroyed seems just a tad overpowered... 1/10 - at least you tried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 it seems to be an offensive monster,so why it has a higher defence points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victory Posted April 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 Becausre its efens dont raise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avariademon Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 well to top off all of thouse reasons why its overpowered its also searchable because it has 1500 ATK, put three in a deck with three flying kamakiris. in addition, how can it tell if a card is a spell or trap? that dosent make sence it should be destroy one monster and two spell or traps, but to make it a bit more ballenced make it 1600 first off and make it so its one monster and one spell or trap, though even thats a bit much its all i can think of at the moment3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victory Posted April 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 ok dude whatev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeroshot Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 Wow, I don't believe people notice this but regular grammar counts. opponent'sAlso Card needs to be caped why did you cap destroyed and not destroys?Overpowered Bad PicSuckish oops, I didn't notice the sukishness of the card was mentioned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victory Posted April 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 wow dude!Anyway thread closed dont post here no more! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeroshot Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 Then change the title Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.