Rawlyn Posted April 18, 2008 Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 I like old-school cards, there's no doubt about that. So I've created a couple of new fusions for two of the classic YGO dragons. I'm not sure what the balance of ATK/DEF are like considering their (albeit simple) effects though, so any input there would be very much appreciated! I hope you like them, and if you don't, well... don't use them! (Images courtesy of "el grimlock" @ deviantart). [align=center] [/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velcroy Posted April 18, 2008 Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 Nice cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted April 18, 2008 Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 meh.... 5/10 due to the supreme lack of origionality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawlyn Posted April 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 Any suggestions for improvements hunterb? LOL, I have just left a thread where I was complaining about how I don't like those double-type cards! (Ugly choice of image btw). I fail to see how making these fusions into non-cards would improve them. I'm only interested in making cards that fit the game of YGO as it currently exists, without making up new sub-rules and card types. Apart from all that, if you read my original post again, you'll notice that I never said that they were original. I never expected them to be either... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted April 18, 2008 Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 i agree with hunter b. lack of orginization Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawlyn Posted April 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 hunterb - would I be correct in saying that the reason you don't like my cards is because you prefer your own? That's hardly a constructive criticism - it offers no advice to me for improvement. All it really says is "to be better you need to be more like me"... and let's face it, that's kind of arrogant. The world would be a very boring place if everyone was just like you. Crimson Ninja - What does "orginization" mean? I tried to find it in the dictionary... it's not there. Is it similar to "originality"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted April 18, 2008 Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 He did mean origionality. I find that insulting. I used the example of my card which got 5 pages of good feedback saying that is good and origional as an EXAMPLE to show you that you need to think outside the box. I can see by the way you speak that we will not get along well, you are another faded or peacekid. Intellegent but do not know how the site works yet. Learn or fall behind and get mistaken as a n00b. - Hunterb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawlyn Posted April 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 The implication you're making is that I'm just posting here, and not reading. It's not always about thinking outside the box - sometimes good old fashioned duelling can be just as good. As long as I know how to spell "originality" (just one 'o'), I reckon I'm safe from being branded as an idiot. Thanks for your input, as uninformative as it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
v8561v Posted April 18, 2008 Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 The cards used aren't THIS original.The effects are a bit overpowered.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawlyn Posted April 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 Thanks for the advice v8561v, perhaps I should add some sort of cost to the effect? Or maybe lower the ATK/DEF to balance things out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
animetor07 Posted April 18, 2008 Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 nice cards but could use better effects.. when i think of a fusion of Red Eyes and Blue Eyes, all but Chaos and Destruction exists.. maybe send to the graveyard or removing cards from play hehehehe. also, don't overpower it, this card should require the fusion of the two cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grayall Posted April 18, 2008 Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 Think about your cards. This is dumb...5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawlyn Posted April 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2008 Think about your cards. This is dumb... I'm curious to know what you think is dumb about these cards. Could you go into more detail please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3000eyes Posted April 20, 2008 Report Share Posted April 20, 2008 Very nice 9/10 -1 only because of "Blue Eyes Red Dragon's" effect *Still awsome though~! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOUL Posted April 20, 2008 Report Share Posted April 20, 2008 The first picture is good.The second isn't very good.Nice cards, i will not go in to detail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted April 20, 2008 Report Share Posted April 20, 2008 don't really like your cards (both of them),so i give a 4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.